For the Record: Tall Poppy Syndrome and The Plight of British Nationalism

*Updated and revised, April 9 2018.

Support for my right to freedom of expression was never going to strongly manifest itself in mainstream press reports. Social media provides a more balanced outlook, although most alt-lite personalities dare not broach the subject of my prosecution. It was interesting to note some tentative mainstream support for Markus Meecham aka Count Dankula, found guilty last month in Scotland of causing gross offence after teaching his girlfriend’s pug to lift its paw on the command ‘Gas the Jews!’.

Meecham now has over 90,000 Twitter followers and 170,000 YouTube subscribers: being found guilty certainly hasn’t put a spanner in his works. Contrary to my songs, it seems Count Dankula’s mischief-making is not considered to be that much of an effective weapon against New World Order orthodoxy. Indeed, Meecham has since been compensated for his sins with a media career. Even Tommy Robinson turned out to report on the recovering communist’s trial. Doubtful that Israel-loving Yaxley-Lennon will be doing the same when the time comes for my verdict to be pronounced. Also unlikely that Ricky Gervais, David Baddiel and Jonathan Pie will be voicing their concerns – as they did regards Meecham – if I, too, am found guilty.

Without doubt, the most significant moment during my cross-examination last month by CPS barrister, Karen Robinson, was her claim that my heartbreak over the incontrovertible disappearance of the white race was ‘nothing more than racism’. Significant in that Ms Robinson’s loaded affirmation puts into perspective the chances of patriots on trial for speech crime – never mind those of sieg-heiling pug dog owners. The barrister’s statement was also notable in that it provoked the only challenge from my own counsel, Adrian Davies, who described Ms Robinson’s general approach as being akin to the persecution of heretics during the Inquisition.

If Ms Robinson’s attempt at turning my prosecution into a witch trial wasn’t enough, since my prolonged ordeal began back in January, my songs have been subject to further criticism from other sources. Not from my accusers, nor indeed from the troops of Hasbara keyboard warriors – although inevitably there has been some of that. No, this criticism comes from within the revisionist-nationalist movement: namely, that my songs would form part of a reckless strategy which risks compromising other revisionists living in countries with no anti-revisionist legislation, i.e. Britain.

The first public utterances of this came via an article in French (a language I understand and speak fluently) posted by the revisionist press agency, Agence Bocage. The article is unsigned. However, having repeatedly heard this exact same ‘strategy’ argument for more than a year, in person, from one notable figure within the UK revisionist ‘elite’ – someone with contacts worldwide, in particular in France and Germany – it wasn’t hard to put two-and-two together. Without wishing to go into too much detail, suffice it to say that I vigorously defended myself and my work from these malign smears.

Putting aside the smears themselves – hardly different in my view to those expressed by my accusers and their acolytes – the most troubling aspect of this personal attack was that it came at a moment when I was most in need of support during my trial, when I would be obliged to take the witness stand. Clearly intended to destabilise me emotionally, this unpleasant situation has also had a negative effect on my ability to produce the necessary goods, i.e. more songs, blogs and videos.

It is one thing as a white nationalist to feel betrayed by politicians, police, media and white liberal goys. It is quite another when the betrayal comes from those within the very movement whose supposed role is to defend nationalist interests. If I had not defended myself, the plotting may well have continued – perhaps by way of a bizarre attempt to bait me by trying to stir up resentment?

Confirmed by two recent Facebook sources, my story – persecuted and prosecuted for singing a song – is now being touted in reference to the unfortunate plight of another comrade-in-arms, Monika Schaefer. Granted, Monika’s fine work could arguably be described as a song of apology to her mother. However, condemnation of my satirical songs, when contrasted with praise extolled for speech crime in countries with anti-revisionist legislation, is troubling to say the least.

Another difference between my own case – located in a country without anti-revisionist laws – and Monika’s, is that my alleged speech crime is indeed set to music. As I am also accused of using Jewish melodies to cause maximum offence, it’s not only my lyrics that pose problem. But why exalt one comrade for questioning the gas chambers in a country where this can land you in jail, whilst simultaneously opining that Chabloz’ songs somehow represent a dangerous impediment to the revisionist cause? It just doesn’t make sense.

180407 tall poppy.jpg

 

Tall poppy syndrome? An underhand ruse intended at best to demoralise me to the point of quitting the movement or, worse still, wear me down to the point of changing my plea? Even more disturbing, as suggested by one colleague, was this internal smear campaign a gift meant for the attention of prosecutors and the court? Even revisionists find Chabloz’ songs grossly offensive! (In my hypothetical defence: technically speaking, my most vocal detractor has never publicly questioned the official ‘Holocaust’ narrative and the author of the Agence Bocage article is anonymous).

If others – including the world’s most notable revisionists – had sided with my critics in the ensuing Battle of the Wills via email, then I would be in a very dark place right now. Happily, apart from a couple of verbally abusive whiteknights – forced to dismount from their respective high horses thanks to a staunch defence of my position by several personalities – this was not the case. Nevertheless, if it had been the visible enemy waging yet another smear campaign against me, then this would have been easier to take in my stride. Ergo, no wonder British nationalism is in such a sad state.

Cutting down tall poppies may be one way of spoiling the chances of a nationalist revival. Indeed, certain species of weed, e.g. Japanese Knot Weed, benefit from a tenacious root system capable of decimating indigenous plant growth. If British nationalism is to make a proper come-back, then such weeds in our midst need to be eradicated. Some may display impressive blooms and evergreen foliage. But look a little closer and you will see how inflexible they are at the stem, how miserly and selective they are regards others’ growth and contribution to the cause. Most telling of all, see how quickly they wilt whenever it’s a case of publicly making statements about gas chambers used in the alleged industrialised extermination of Jews during WW2.

In this business, it’s hard enough knowing who to trust. I prefer to rely on myself. No one wants to be made to look a fool – even less to have been duped for decades by deep state infiltrators whose agenda includes provocation, disruption and outright treachery. Since this split became apparent, I and others have worked hard to try and resolve it. On countless occasions, I have publicly stated that I am willing to sit face-to-face with my main critic and discuss these issues candidly and without prejudice. A sad irony indeed that a supposed champion of free speech would shun debate, effectively providing comfort and nourishment to the real enemy. 

So-called comrades who initiated these attacks on my work during the most trying period of my life can rest assured that I shall not be throwing in the towel. I and several others believe that whatever the verdict next month, it’s a win-win situation. I went down the legal route in order to challenge the official ‘Holocaust’ narrative in the courts, to bring publicity to the revisionist movement and to expose the malign effect ‘denial’ laws have on the right to freedom of expression in other countries. (Note, whilst British nationalist politics is seemingly splintered beyond repair, countries which do have such laws have thriving nationalist parties).

If I am found guilty, resulting in a legal precedent effectively outlawing questioning of the gas chambers, what will be the reaction of my in-house detractors towards others facing prosecution in the future? Will it be: ‘Such a hero! Such bravery!’ as in the case of Monika Schaefer and others? Will my name be dragged up, fingers pointing accusingly, ‘All Chabloz’ fault’?

Although Markus Meecham should never have been prosecuted in the first place, is his crass comedy in any way comparable to my revisionist musical satire? Will a guilty verdict resulting in de facto anti-revisionist legislation here in England prevent others from speaking out? In my view, it’s far too late for that. At least Count Dankula’s verdict serves to shed more light on the agenda of those ruling over us and who, accordingly, pull the strings of our elected leaders. There is no doubt in my mind that a guilty verdict as far as my music is concerned will have been worth every note, every bar, right down to the final chord.

 

(First published April 7 2018. Revised and updated April 9 2018. An account of Battle of the Wills can be found in the March edition of Dr Fredrick Töben’s Adelaide Institute newsletter).

___________________________________________________________________________________________

If you would like to support my work, please find links to PayPal and BitCoin on the right-hand sidebar. 

47 thoughts on “For the Record: Tall Poppy Syndrome and The Plight of British Nationalism

    • Alison Chabloz April 7, 2018 / 5:28 pm

      Indeed. The CPS knows full well that witness Steve Silverman was subject to an investigation for mal comms in 2016 – the same witness who admitted in court papers he ran the Twitter troll account concerned!

      Liked by 1 person

      • Sophie Johnson April 8, 2018 / 8:12 am

        Funny, the above, for the same witness admitted, in response to Adrian Davies’s question to him in court, that he will go on persecuting you even once you are acquitted. (Is this the ‘enforcer’s’ megalomania? And will he soon take to biting [sic] chunks off the doubters of his might?)

        Like

  1. Sophie Johnson April 7, 2018 / 5:13 pm

    Well done, Alison, for laying out the facts of the ‘friendly’ fire that was meant to fell you just as your day in the dock was approaching. It would have been ugly enough if your attacker’s motive had been no more than to let loose a volley of extreme pique because you, and not she, are squarely at the forefront of Nationalism/Revisionism in the UK, and a major player on the international scene.
    But her attack was in fact much uglier that ‘ugly enough’: The (anonymous) Agence Bocage article sought to present you as a wrecker of the Revisionist position, indeed, as the wrecker whose voiced approach to ‘the holocaust’ is such that fair-minded British people find it ‘grossly offensive’ (i.e., a crime, no less), and your eventual jailing for it will put other Revisionists in danger.

    This attack meant to slay. It is not only that it invited your fellow Revisionists to shun you. It had also the potential to be the lead case against you in the hands of the prosecution. Being without a case of its own that is worth a fig, the prosecution would have made good use of this Agence Bocage smear to argue that even Revisionists find your satiric songs about ‘the holocaust’ grossly offensive, so the general public is sure to do so too: That is, ‘the reasonable man’ test should see you found guilty and jailed.

    Fortunately, you were on the ball pretty smartly, and you let the local and international Revisionist scene know what had happened. Nonetheless, it took even a few of the in-the-know Revisionists a while to realise the extent of the perfidy of your attacker. Those revisionists simply thought that you had made public a personal quarrel with your attacker. It was thanks to Dr Fredrick Toben that the real situation got a thorough airing. Fortunately, he is by nature a truth seeker, and a man of unshakeable principle who was not going to look away while your attacker and her mentor make a holocaust of you on the pyre of their treacherous Agence Bocage concoction.

    I wish you had not had to cope with this obscene perfidy of ‘friends’, Alison, and especially not when it hit you. But since you did have to, I congratulate you sincerely on your good sense in blowing the whistle on your attacker, and thereby summoning the help of your many Nationalist/Revisionist friends: That publicity did a timely gambaAzione on her (or more likely, her mentor’s) dastardly plan for seeing you off the Nationalist/Revisionist scene.

    Liked by 1 person

    • Alison Chabloz April 7, 2018 / 5:39 pm

      Yes, Sophie, I am glad this nasty episode is behind us. I think it will take a little more time for the whole picture to emerge. Still, the enemy within revealed their own position in their own words on multiple occasions. My years commenting and publishing on social media have served me well. Thank you very much for your reply.

      Liked by 1 person

  2. Ciaran Goggins April 7, 2018 / 5:46 pm

    British nationalism is failing as everyone wants to be chief. Also, heavily infiltrated by Old Bill.

    Liked by 2 people

  3. Sophie Johnson April 7, 2018 / 6:45 pm

    ‘… heavily infiltrated by Old Bill.’ Horrors. What form does ‘infiltrated’ take? And how do you know that it is infiltrated? (My questions might sounf naive, but they are deadly serious. And I have not yet met anyone who could give me a passably decent answer.)

    Liked by 1 person

    • Ciaran Goggins April 7, 2018 / 7:05 pm

      The far right accepts help without filtering it. Info leaks like a sieve and one needs to look at informers (don’t be too paranoid, the police want that).

      Liked by 1 person

      • Sophie Johnson April 7, 2018 / 8:20 pm

        You make yourself perfectly obscure, Ciaran. 🙂

        Liked by 1 person

  4. Last unctives April 7, 2018 / 10:49 pm

    Alison is completely correct, to out these narcissist careerists , in revisionist circles, but in general soft neo nationalism the BNP UKIP EDL Britain First , National Action ect has been shilled for years with the fake theory , of white ethnoism , rather than the reality ,( just as the racist police state sneered and jibed in court ) the disappearance of the white race an actual legal state abolition of a racial nation, the former GB UK. Soft neo nationalism has been totally defeated in the UK, and Brexit gathers dust now replaced by Bremain. As for the Apologists for the disgusting show trial that Alison has undergone for nearly 2 years now, how fucking low can you get ! Please name the names Alison , but I think I can quess whose on that shit list. MI5 infiltration is very real , but only if you allow it like the BNP ect . As the Mexican border collapses the failed Alt Right Kike Right are being outted , please keep rocking that boat , on yeah and while I’m at it Fuck Marine Le Pen as well.All the best Alison .LOL.

    Liked by 1 person

    • Alison Chabloz April 7, 2018 / 10:54 pm

      Battle of the Wills – round one – was published by Dr Töben in the March edition of his Adelaide Institute newsletter, starting on page 33. I am unfortunately unable to share the link because the newsletter contains lyrics and video links of my *restricted* songs. Battle of the Wills – round two – will be published shortly in the same format.

      Like

  5. blah blah April 8, 2018 / 8:52 am

    Oh poor Alison. A poppy amongst the weeds. Loving the weeds analogy. That’s what you are…a big weed. Weeds can and are destroyed daily.

    The Pug man was an idiot and shouldn’t have been prosecuted. The difference between you and him is idiot vs antisemitic, racist calculating horrible woman.

    Like

    • Sophie Johnson April 8, 2018 / 1:21 pm

      You’ve arrived, you sad old tart! My you’ve aged badly. It’s the bile. No pills for it? Pity, for you are about to explode. But credit where credit is due: the name you have chosen characterises you well. Yet there is a better one still: ‘Everything I say is a lie’. Emblazon it on a medallion, and hang it about youe neck. Mind it doesn’t choke you.

      Like

      • WHO AM I April 8, 2018 / 1:54 pm

        Awww did I hit a nerve ALISON

        Like

  6. WHO AM I April 8, 2018 / 2:16 pm

    Like

    • Alison Chabloz April 8, 2018 / 2:56 pm

      ‘Who am I’?

      My guess, judging you’re using Android and posting a video, the title of which also happens to be the Twitter name used to troll me on behalf of CAA for over a year, would be Andrea Silva.

      No doubt we have a wizened troll on our hands. Plus ça change…

      All IP addresses used will no doubt lead a trail back to your device in Tower Hamlets.

      Further comments will be trashed, so don’t bother coming back and wasting your own time, not to mention your own life.

      Liked by 3 people

      • Ciaran Goggins April 8, 2018 / 5:57 pm

        Funny how the CPS decided not to prosecute Jean Hatchet/Vonny Watts for hate speech (against transgender folk) her close links to South Yorkshite Police would have nothing to do with it?

        Like

        • Alison Chabloz April 8, 2018 / 6:20 pm

          Funny how Derbyshire Constabulary ignored evidence of an organised harassment campaign against me by Shitrit, Silva and then Silverman, Applebaum & co – and then arrested me (five times) for alleged ‘offences’ committed against these same specimens. Not to mention the FoI request which revealed how Falter and Silverman bribed the Derby PCC to have me arrested again and held in custody for 48 hours – all for singing a couple of songs.

          Liked by 2 people

          • Ciaran Goggins April 8, 2018 / 7:11 pm

            Like Norfolk Police? Death threats to Chief Constable, no evidence or proof offered. Coincidence it was when a corruption probe into Old Bill was launched?

            Like

          • oh dear April 9, 2018 / 8:31 pm

            Well done. You’ve just libelled two people and accused the police of corruption. Speak to Mr Irvine about losing libel suits. I hear it’s very very expensive

            Liked by 1 person

            • Alison Chabloz April 9, 2018 / 8:47 pm

              Oh dear, who are you accusing of libel?

              Good luck with your case. Hope your pockets are deep enough.

              Liked by 1 person

  7. Henry B April 9, 2018 / 2:09 am

    If accurately reported, then the prosecutor’s hateful comment in response to your expression of concern at the prospect of our people disappearing/becoming a minority, is itself offensive and deserving of prosecution. Alison, will you be examined in the dock again or has that phase now passed?

    Liked by 2 people

    • Alison Chabloz April 9, 2018 / 10:37 am

      Thanks for your comment, Henry, My cross-examination is over.

      The prosecutor’s allegation of ‘racism’ refers to my response to police questions in relation to a song which is not part of the charges brought against me. All very sinister.

      Like

  8. Chris Livingstone April 9, 2018 / 7:53 am

    The infiltration of the right is extensive we all must understand. With troublemakers in every group deliberately destabilising all hard work and causing splits. It’s been this way forever. As for the individuals trying to start some sort of issue a higher platform for their own work is maybe what they desire more than supporting what should be one of our own. So they bismerch and reveal much of their own weakness. I will be with you again soon. Regards Chris

    Liked by 2 people

    • Alison Chabloz April 9, 2018 / 8:57 pm

      Thank you Chris. Sad to see nationalism failing to deliver. Even UKIP are a lost cause.

      Like

  9. Henry B April 9, 2018 / 6:26 pm

    Not being in the loop I was unaware of your recent ‘in-house’ difficulties so I took the hint and went to Töben’s March newsletter. I can’t say I was surprised by what I read as betrayal and treason are par for the course today.

    Interesting surname for a prosecutor in this particular case. I wonder if she knows the significance
    of her name in relation to the drafting of the Holocaust narrative and its inorganic development. If brought to her attention I doubt her saccharine smile would survive an encounter with the truth.

    Liked by 2 people

    • Alison Chabloz April 9, 2018 / 10:19 pm

      Perhaps, in such circumstances, Tommy Robinson might also reconsider his choice of nom de plume?

      Like

      • Henry B April 9, 2018 / 11:11 pm

        Does “Tommy” even know what day it is? Maybe the elders renamed him in honour of someone he’s never heard of? In fact I doubt Tommy if could find his own dick in the dark without that “light unto the nations” to show him the way.

        Liked by 1 person

  10. Sophie Johnson April 9, 2018 / 10:04 pm

    ‘But why exalt one comrade for questioning the gas chambers in a country where this can land you in jail, whilst simultaneously opining that Chabloz’ songs somehow represent a dangerous impediment to the revisionist cause? It just doesn’t make sense.’

    No, of course it does not make sense. But then, ‘sense’ is not their quest. But, treacherous as they are, wide exposure (thanks to Dr Toben) has sent them scurrying for cover.

    And I think I have spotted another dark underbelly of the ‘comrades’: Someone must have alerted the German authorities to Monika’s presence in Germany. She was there for hardly a week before they nabbed her, and she did nothing to attract attention to herself. Some ‘comrades’ were also there at the time. Thank God you were not.

    Alfred Schaefer has pointed out that Monika was born in Canada, and has never held German citizenship. (There is no explicit holocaust law in Canada.) And Monika did not perform her musical apology in Germany. So for goodness’ sakes, do not go to Germany, on any account, no matter how attractive an invitation might be: I cannot see our Home Office doing a better job of demanding that the German authorities respect your rights than the equivalent Canadian body is doing for Monika.

    Liked by 1 person

    • Alison Chabloz April 9, 2018 / 10:17 pm

      Monika’s offending video was recorded and uploaded in Germany 2016. When a ‘crime’ has been committed on German soil and there is a flight risk, the perpetrator will be held on remand. Sent you an email.

      Liked by 1 person

      • Sophie Johnson April 9, 2018 / 11:36 pm

        ‘Monika’s offending video was recorded and uploaded in Germany 2016.’ Ouch. That makes my reply to your email irrelevant, unless’ who knew’ is relevant here. Poor Monika.

        Like

        • Alison Chabloz April 10, 2018 / 7:50 am

          Information surrounding Monika’s arrest and detention is unclear. But the fact that she’s being held at all is of course utterly shameful.

          Liked by 1 person

  11. Mary Louise April 10, 2018 / 10:26 pm

    Ms Robinson is clearly using you, Alison, to advance her career. Knowing the over representation of Jews in the Jewdicial (sic) system, imagine the kudos she can accrue if she successfully prosecutes the “egregious anti-Semite”, Alison Chabloz.

    Like

      • Mary Louise April 10, 2018 / 11:29 pm

        Good! Long may it continue.

        Liked by 1 person

      • Henry B April 10, 2018 / 11:50 pm

        Has she, or anyone else on their side of the divide, ever said why the CPS changed its collective mind and went ahead with a prosecution which (if I have it right) it had earlier declined?

        Like

        • Sophie Johnson April 11, 2018 / 9:12 am

          Henry, she, the DPP, has said nothing. But Joshua Rozenberg has been briefed:

          https://www.facebook.com/JoshuaRozenbergQC/posts/277022552719668 .

          In short, the CAA had begun a High Court action to obtain a judicial opinion on whether article 17 of the ECHR obliges the prosecution of all sorts of ‘antisemitisms’. The DPP/CPS stopped that action by agreeing that it is so obliged.

          It seems that the DPP/CPS just got the law hopelessly wrong. Had they got it right, or had they got away with getting it wrong, people prosecuted under article 17 would not have had recourse to the ECHR article 10 guarantee of the right to free speech. But they didn’t and they haven’t. So the prosecution finds itself without a case. And the DPP finds herself booted out.

          Liked by 1 person

  12. Henry B April 11, 2018 / 8:27 pm

    Thanks, Sophie. For a group supposedly lacking in abnormal influence, these people do seem able to gain access to the highest offices in the land and express their concerns and demands in such a way that draws a more than sympathetic response. That’s something we are not able to do. All of which behaviour would seem go some way to confirming Mr. Turner’s street rhetoric for him.

    I seriously think Mr Turner should call or summons as a witness the “junior” lawyer at the CPS who spent five months coming to the conclusion that he (Mr. Turner) had not committed any crime in this matter, and therefore had no case to answer.

    As a patriotic ex serviceman he deserves that much support at least from the Crown; and as a taxpayer, he’s already paid for it.

    Perhaps it’s time to form a counter-charity to defend these anti-gentile attacks on British people and British values.

    Liked by 2 people

    • Sophie Johnson April 12, 2018 / 11:21 am

      This is an especially super post of yours, Henry. That behind-closed-doors decisions like those of the CPS about Jez Turner’s prosecution are allowed to happen is really sinister, the more so because they happen at the behest of a shonky organisation like the CAA, and are allowed by the DPP.

      Do you know that the prosecution is putting up only one witness in Jez’s case, and that that witness is the policeman who was on the scene at Jez’s Shomrim demo and had objected to nothing during its course? The creepy Falter chap declined to be a witness, for he had to admit that he was not even present at this demo that he claims had made a victim of him so grievously?

      The particularly offensive thing is that these CAA thugs are daring to subject fine people of excellent social standing like Alison and Jez to severe harassment. I still remember my seething fury when I first heard that Alison had been clapped into irons five times by the police, on the behest of the CAA thugs, and thanks to the swinging bail conditions that the shabbos shiksa judge Emma Arbuthnot had arbitrarily imposed on her. (This judge had to recuse herself when Alison discovered that she had been on an all-expenses-paid Israel junket with her MP husband, and that she has a long history of activism in a number of Jewish sell-serving organisations.)

      Sorry I keep going on, but: As soon as this is over, WE MUST ORGANISE A HUGE DEMO to demand that Jews cease to harass us, and that the shabbos shiksa instincts of the PM, of Amber Rudd the Home Secretary and of Chief Magistrate Emma Arbuthnot cease to encourage Jews to think that they are entitled to harass us. And we might as well add that we want Friends of Israel out of Parliament, and declared an illegal organisation.

      Liked by 1 person

      • Henry B April 12, 2018 / 10:44 pm

        Thanks, Sophie.

        Quote:

        “Do you know that the prosecution is putting up only one witness in Jez’s case, and that that witness is the policeman who was on the scene at Jez’s Shomrim demo and had objected to nothing during its course? The creepy Falter chap declined to be a witness, for he had to admit that he was not even present at this demo that he claims had made a victim of him so grievously?”

        According to the CAA website as it stands today, the CAA has not yet corrected Mr. Falter’s origional claim that he had witnessed Mr. Turner’s speech.

        Quote:

        “CAA’s Chairman, Gideon Falter, who had witnessed the speech, applied for Victims’ Right to Review, but was told by the CPS that he was not a victim and had no victim’s rights”.

        Source: https://antisemitism.uk/after-13-month-legal-battle-caa-wins-landmark-high-court-case-against-director-of-public-prosecutions-over-non-prosecution-of-neo-nazi/

        This farce is nothing short of a scandal.

        I think we have seen here the birth of a new legal expression…”A FALTERER” = A frivolous/vexatious litigant whose legs gave out at the prospect of having to step into the witness box and support his own case.

        Perhaps Mr, Turner could call him as a witness and have him examined in front of judge and jury, and a well stocked public gallery.

        Liked by 2 people

  13. Henry B April 11, 2018 / 9:55 pm

    I mean the absolute fuckin’ irony of Falter & Co marching into the Home Secretary’s office to complain, to the now Prime Minister, that some people confined to the street should be prosecuted for saying that people like himself (Falter) had access to Government ministers and sought to exert influence for his own group interest…

    Quote:

    “Home Secretary Theresa May said: “I was very pleased to welcome Gideon Falter to the Home Office so we could discuss the response of the police and prosecutors to antisemitism and hate crime. I hope we can continue to work together to eradicate antisemitism in all its forms.”

    Source: https://antisemitism.uk/campaign-against-antisemitism-meets-with-home-secretary-police-and-cps-chiefs-to-address-antisemitism/

    Last week the Pope announced there was no such place as Hell. He needs to visit the UK…Pronto!

    Liked by 2 people

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

w

Connecting to %s