Free expression or permitted opinion: that is the choice – the conviction of Jez Turner

By Robert Henderson

Update: An expanded version of Robert Henderson’s article can be found here.

180515 jezWrite to Jez Turner at the following address:

Jeremy Bedford-Turner
A5544EE
HMP Wandsworth
Heathfield Road
London SW18 3HU

Yesterday Jeremy Bedford-Turner known as Jez Turner was convicted at Southwark Crown Court in London of inciting racial hatred during a speech he gave in 2015 outside Downing Street . In this speech he attacked Jewish influence, most particularly, the Met Police’s support for and enablement of a Jewish security organisation known as the Shomrim . He was sentenced to 12 months, six of which will be served in prison and the rest on licence.

Did Jez have a chance of acquittal? Well, he had a jury trial so that gave him some chance of an acquittal. Had it been a trial without a jury he would have had none. But even with a jury the odds were heavily against a not guilty verdict. In the minds of jurors must be the fear of being called a racist which has been so successfully inculcated in the general population that it produces an automated reflex of panic and terror when faced with the possibility of the label being put on them. Any juror faced with a case such as this must have it in the back of their minds at least that to return a not guilty verdict would be to risk being called a racist. There is also the sheer shock factor of hearing politically incorrect views being unashamedly spoken. As it was the jury was out for less than two hours and returned a unanimous verdict of guilty.

The case was originally turned down by the Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) as not meting their evidential standard for a prosecution. The Campaign Against Anti-Semitism threatened the CPS with a judicial review of their decision not to prosecute. Faced with that the CPS caved in and prosecuted. It is worth noting that running a judicial review is very expensive. The fact that the CAA managed to get the CPS prosecute effectively creates two tiers of justice, that for the rich and that for the poor.

I shall be writing a fuller account of the trial later but I can say unequivocally that the judge showed his bias against Jez from the word go in both his actions and manner. He began by refusing a request by Jez’s barrister to put questions to prospective jurors to discover if any off them were members of the CAA or the Community Security Trust, a charity which has surprising support from the Met Police for a quasi-police group known as the Shomrim – see below. During this passage of the hearing the judge said with great distaste that it was shocking that such an organisation as the CAA needed to exist but that was the way of the world.

The judge also intervened on a number of occasions when Jez was being cross-examined to dispute what Jez was saying.This was not his job, it was the job of the prosecutor to challenge what Jez was saying.

The other thing to note was the way both judge and prosecuting counsel accepted opinion as fact and were seemingly oblivious to what they were doing which in short was enforcing the politically correct view of the world. For example, prosecuting counsel thought nothing of quoting a senior judge that freedom of expression had to be compatible with the “standards of a just and fair multiracial society”.

What has been made very clear in this trial (and that of the trial of Alison Chabloz) is that we have an elite which is hell bent on squeezing the range of permitted opinion ever more tightly into a politically correct shape.

The other striking thing about this trial is the paucity of media comment. One might have thought the mainstream media would have jumped all over the matter but the only mainstream press attending the trial was the Press Association. Why? Well, I suspect it was because although the politically correct wanted the prosecution and a guilty verdict they did not want the politically incorrect nature of much of the evidence to come before the public’s eyes.

Where does all this leave us? Free expression is essential to democracy and political freedom. Take it away and oppression soon fills the void. It also has a general cultural value. Its importance is examined in detail in my essay Freedom or permitted opinion below. . Beneath that you will find a number of reports of Jez’ trial and a couple on the truly amazing powers granted to the Shomrim both here and abroad.

Army Veteran Jailed For Stirring Up Racial Hatred 

 

75 thoughts on “Free expression or permitted opinion: that is the choice – the conviction of Jez Turner

  1. Sophie Johnson May 15, 2018 / 1:27 pm

    Thank you for this brilliant analysis, Robert. By golly I wish Jez would appeal! This judge sounds as thick as a plank, and downright nasty. Quite clearly, he ran together two meanings: (i) the voicing of an opinion in public’ and (ii) ‘incitement to racial hatred’. That is not valid logically, so it cannot be valid in law. That he displayed his hostility to Jez is foul play, for it cannot but have transferred to the jury. And he failed to warn the jury to make its decision without fear of contemporary PC slurs. Indeed, he seems to have cast those slurs himself. The last straw is his declining to allow Jez to question the jury. There is a mountain of stuff here for appeal against the verdict, surely.

    Liked by 4 people

    • Robert Henderson May 16, 2018 / 8:44 am

      It is worse than that Sophie. In his directions to the jury the judge made it clear that there did not have to be any proof provided that people had been offended merely that the words could have offended or were capable of offending.

      Liked by 3 people

      • Sophie Johnson May 16, 2018 / 9:14 am

        What? But that is surely just plain wrong in law, Robert! This swine of a judge actually misled the jury. There is a High Court analysis in principle that distinguishes ‘offensive’ and ‘grossly offensive’: the latter is a crime, the former is not. You know, it actually looks as if this judge wants his decision appealed, perhaps knowing that the appeal judge will endorse it.

        Liked by 1 person

        • Robert Henderson May 16, 2018 / 10:59 am

          The prosecution have to justify their position that the words are grossly offensive but they do not have to show anyone was grossly offended. This seems mad to the lay person, Sophie, but there are many crimes which rely on actions carried out before any harm is done, for example, preparations for committing terrorist acts and conspiracies. The real problem with this type of charge is that it allows a high degree of subjectivity in making the value judgement.

          Liked by 3 people

          • Sophie Johnson May 17, 2018 / 12:53 pm

            ‘there are many crimes which rely on actions carried out before any harm is done’.

            OK. But is this one of those crimes? I.e., so what if any of the Morlocks is offended to the quickest quick? That is hardly ‘harm’ done to him. How offended a Morlock is cannot be in anyone’s control but that Morlock’s. So how can anyone but that Motlock be responsible for the extent of his offended state?

            Robert, I’m still convinced that this rotten judge was wrong to have advised the jury that there is such a thing as a victimless crime in this context. Whatever anyone does to ‘offend’ a Morlock is finished in itself; there is no consequence. So pre-emption of future harm does not apply here. (Of course, if anyone had threatened a Morlock with violence, that would amount to victim-making. But this bastard judge had no such excuse.) .

            Liked by 1 person

        • Sophie Johnson May 17, 2018 / 12:54 pm

          Thank you, thetruthnotdoctrine!

          Liked by 1 person

  2. voice of reason May 15, 2018 / 3:47 pm

    The wonderful thing about this country is that there is a line between Free Speech and Hate Speech. Screaming hatred about a minority be it Jews, Muslims etc is a hate crime. It was a nonsense that the CAA had to take the steps they did to get the CPS to prosecute. Mr Turner will now have 12 months to reflect on his behaviour. I hope that others who preach hate in the guise of FOS learn from this.

    Liked by 1 person

    • Henry B May 15, 2018 / 6:47 pm

      “Screaming hatred about a minority be it Jews, Muslims etc is a hate crime”….

      Meanwhile screaming hatred about the English isn’t…lucky for the Jack Straws of this world, eh?

      History proves that minorities can also be hateful and worse. Indeed we are now familiar with ‘exotic’ rape gangs that prey on English children and have their roots in far off lands: a ‘minority’ who go about their exercise safe in the knowledge that the same authorities who provide for the right of the Jewish community to organise and prosecute in such a unique way are also preventing the English from forming a ‘Shomrim’ type group for the protection of native children abandoned to the unfettered madness of the cultural/ethnic diversity that you would have us celebrate.

      I wonder if the Palestinians were receiving the love this week, or the Law?

      Liked by 4 people

    • thetruthnotdoctrine May 15, 2018 / 7:41 pm

      Hate? What like this do you mean:
      “Gentlemen. Welcome to the Second Centenial Meeting of The Learned Elders of Zion. We have achieved all of the objectives expressed at our first meeting 100 years ago. We control governments, we have created dissention among our enemies and made them kill each other. We have effectively silenced criticism of our affairs and we are the richest race of men on this earth.

      Many of you are very busy men, let us get to the the crux of the matter. As masters of business, politics, law and most importantly media we are ready to implement our most important and ambitious programme, one that will finally and totally remove from existence the impediments of our absolute control of this earth. I SPEAK OF THE DEATH OF THE WHITE RACE, THE COMPLETE REMOVAL OF ALL MEANS OF REPRODUCTION OF THE SO-CALLED ARYAN RACE. Men, we now control the destiny of this race. It is now time to make sure the white race becomes extinct through miscegenation and having a virtually zero birth rate.

      We have all enjoyed the vision, repeated all over this world every day, of the last white children playing with little dark children and knowing that they are being set up for their eventual destruction. We can ruin the ancient pure blood line of an Aryan child by convincing him or her of the altruism of beggetting interracial children. We must expose the race mixing of the urban centres to the suburbs and rural areas of this country. More agressive programmes to integrate these areas are now underway through HUD. It is worth any price to annihilate the next generation of white children.

      We want every white father to feel the sting of having their children marry coloured mates and produce biracial children. We must use our power to discourage white men and women who still persist in getting together from producing more pure white children.

      They will be ostracized by not becoming part of the new society of all races. This will dissuade most of them. We will deal with the the less co-operative goyim non-Jews by murder and imprisonment.

      Finally, we will see the end of this white race. Impressionable white children will have their minds moulded into the agents of their own destruction. Already our efforts have succeeded in making the men of this race grovel at our feet. Men, you and your ancestors have worked hard to make sure we would have the power to hold the destiny of this race in our hands. Now we have it, perish aryan goyim!”

      — Abe Foxman, The Jewish Anti Defamation League (ADL) 25th August 1998

      Liked by 2 people

    • Sophie Johnson May 15, 2018 / 7:51 pm

      VOICE OF TREASON: You hate a fine upstanding Englishman, don’t you, jewboy?

      Liked by 1 person

    • Sophie Johnson May 15, 2018 / 8:09 pm

      If you had some brain power, VOICE OF TREASON, you would understand that Free Speech and Hate Speech are conceptually like chalk and cheese, not separated by a line. Jez exercised his right of Free Speech. For your kind, that is Hate Speech. But only for your kind.

      Liked by 2 people

  3. last unctives May 15, 2018 / 3:51 pm

    These are political trials , nothing to do with a real actual crime , these political statutes destroy equality before the law , really legal arguments are absurd even good ones since to be victimised by such political judges , political prosecutions, parliamentary police courts is to legitimise the source of its criminal authority , the dictatorship of parliament. The separation of powers between executive and law doesn’t exist. Hence the corruption of the judges cobshite . Most juries are crap , depending on who you work for , they might have voted not guilty but fear losing their job , being smeared ect . For me the choice would be clear having experienced it already , exile or a quick death in prison.

    Liked by 3 people

    • voice of reason May 15, 2018 / 4:31 pm

      You are talking total garbage. He broke the law, he had a fair trial, he was found guilty. He went to prison. End of story. Jurors are anonymous and have nothing to fear from a verdict. You speak as one with the same views as Turner so your bias is obvious. Don’t preach hate then you won’t get a criminal record. Simples.

      Like

      • Alison Chabloz May 15, 2018 / 4:42 pm

        You speak in the same way as so-called ‘anti-fascists’ from Hate Not Hope [sic] or the UAF.

        Liked by 4 people

        • voice of reason May 15, 2018 / 6:06 pm

          Nope. I belong to no-one and nothing. Just me hunny!

          Like

          • thetruthnotdoctrine May 15, 2018 / 7:47 pm

            You belong to the Cultural Jew Marxists – 100% and have never had an original thought of your own in your whole useless life – some other arsehole always doing your thinking for you.

            Liked by 2 people

      • William Gruff May 15, 2018 / 6:09 pm

        The CPS didn’t think he’d broken the law but an unprecedentedly powerful minority interest pressure group had sufficient political influence to force the courts to throw the basic tenets of English justice onto the constitutional scrap heap in their vicious and vindictive effort to silence opinions they find disagreeable. All this gross miscarriage of English justice has really done is to confirm the opinions of Jez Turner. When will you people learn that screwing down the lid on the pressure cooker may stop the noise for a while, it cannot reduce the heat and an explosion is inevitable eventually.

        Voice of Reason? You’re fooling no one.

        Liked by 5 people

  4. Jaime Antecol May 15, 2018 / 4:11 pm

    Jez called for the expulsion of the entire Jewish population of the UK from the steps of Whitehall. That’s incitement of harm. Full stop.

    Like

    • ivernazza May 15, 2018 / 5:33 pm

      There’s an old joke going around in France… stop anyone on the street and tell him that, from now on, all the Jews and all the hairdressers are to be expelled at once from the country. Invariably, you’ll get the answer: “Why the hairdressers?” (Vox populi — or do you want it served to you in Hebrew?)…

      I hope that Alison’s trial went well (and that I may now stop haken-crossing my fingers for her) — or did she get a judge bending over too?

      Liked by 3 people

    • Sophie Johnson May 15, 2018 / 7:25 pm

      ‘… an unprecedentedly powerful minority interest pressure group had sufficient political influence to force the courts to throw the basic tenets of English justice onto the constitutional scrap heap…’

      Perfect. This is the crux of the matter. We are damned fools for tolerating it. The separation of powers is an essential principle of the rule of law. But what care our sock-puppet politicians and Jews-fearing judges? Can we not organise a rolling demonstration that leaflets at least the predominantly White city centres (no London’s)?

      Liked by 2 people

    • Sophie Johnson May 15, 2018 / 7:27 pm

      He did not. He said that he would like the Jews to leave England. No trace of incitement to anything here.

      Liked by 2 people

    • wtflmaoblog May 15, 2018 / 9:44 pm

      Incitement of harm?
      I would have said it was a start.
      Stop playing the eternal victim card, it’s boring.
      Just be thankful that the British public are oblivious at the moment to the continued interference by foreign traitors, in our Nationhood, But! That is changing fast.
      Stand by for when the penny drops.

      Liked by 3 people

  5. Teresa May May 15, 2018 / 5:42 pm

    The real question is ‘who is Jez Turner’? He is most certainly not a British Nationalist. He has the same sort of background as John Le Mesurier, army trained at Sandhurst with an army intelligence background. Mesurier conned £70m out of gullible Boris to set up the White Helmet fraud.

    No one has ever been able to trace Turner’s source of income, where he lives or where he works. No one knows whether he is married or not, or if he has children. No nationalist in history has been this tight or been able to get away with being this tight on his personal life.

    So is Turner MI5 and was the trial set up to give Turner a much needed holiday break? Or is Turner just going to fade away in to the background.

    Assange revealed the full names and addresses of members of the British National Party, thus his current dilemma vis a vis his asylum matters not to true Nationslists.

    Is this what Turner will do or has done to remaining nationalists? Everything points to Turner being an MI5 traitor. And until Turner promoted Alison Chabloz no one had ever heard of her.

    Maybe Chabloz should take more care over her friendships. Turner used her very effectively. So who is Turner really? No one actually knows, this is the problem.

    Liked by 1 person

    • voice of reason May 15, 2018 / 6:09 pm

      Err.John Le Mesurier who was in Dads Army and who has been dead for many years? Don’t think he and Boris were ever in touch! Check your facts.

      Like

      • Philip May 18, 2018 / 12:38 pm

        He/she should also check where Jez Turner did his army training. It certainly wasn’t Sandhurst, they don’t train corporals there.

        Like

    • Alison Chabloz May 15, 2018 / 9:00 pm

      The Jews of CAA – my accusers – are responsible for my ‘fame’, not the London Forum.

      Why aren’t you using your real name ‘Teresa’? – WHY, if you are a genuine nationalist, are you joining forces with the enemy to attack other nationalists?

      I’ve read all this before on EKP. Please go and bother someone else.

      Liked by 2 people

      • Teresa May May 15, 2018 / 10:31 pm

        Turner has consistently lied about his past. In one radio interview he claimed he had stood as a teenager in South West London in the 1990s for the National Front.

        There is no record of this and in any case, in those days you had to be over 21 to be a National Front candidate. Turner is a fraud. He is a liar. He can not be trusted.

        But you, Chabloz, can choose your friends, but I would say you are not a good judge of character, but that is not for me to worry about.

        No one can confirm or deny Turner’s identity because for some unsound reason, perhaps because of his lies, he needs to hide who he really is. A bit like Yaxley Lennon/Tommy Robinson who was funded by Pam Geller and Frank Gaffney when he set up the EDL.

        Who is Turner funded by?

        Thank you to the poster who corrected me. I meant James Le Mesurier. There is a picture of him standing on the quayside in Istanbul waiting for his link to the faux White Helmets.

        Le Mesurier and Turner, enuff said.

        Liked by 1 person

          • Sophie Johnson May 16, 2018 / 9:25 am

            These shonky, shoddy, genetically diseases morlocks would love to smear Jez. His very glamour makes them squeal in agony. But surely they do not really expect that they (of all low-lives!) can reverse our huge appreciation of Jez, nor our affection for him?

            Liked by 2 people

  6. last unctives May 15, 2018 / 6:08 pm

    .Fair play to Jez he wasn’t playing Auschwitz monopoly out side a synagogue was he ? Ever notice how the words massacre and Israel always seem to be in same sentence recently?Guess it’s got nothing to do with preaching hate , must be a random coincidence.

    Liked by 3 people

    • voice of reason May 15, 2018 / 6:14 pm

      You are a Nazi. Turner is a Nazi. Nazis end up in prison. Israel are behaving abominably but don’t blame all Jews for the Israeli Government. Two totally separate things. Not all Jews are Zionists. I have no love for the country or the people.

      Like

      • thetruthnotdoctrine May 15, 2018 / 7:32 pm

        Why don’t you tell us what a German National Socialist is, instead of spewing lying Jew propaganda at us and at the same time looking like an ignorant fool.

        Oh and Jews are an ethno-religious tribe – Zionism is a smokescreen.

        Liked by 2 people

      • Sophie Johnson May 15, 2018 / 8:46 pm

        So, VOICE OF TREASON, Jez is a Nazi now, not MI5? (You’d better go and sleep it off.)

        Liked by 2 people

      • ivernazza May 15, 2018 / 10:06 pm

        Kindly avoid ‘Nazi’ — which is a derogatory term… Just say/write “national socialist” which is the correct term. or if wanting in time (or energy), just use the initials “NS”…

        By the way… why ‘Neo’? Just say/write “National Socialist” or “NS. Thank you.

        Liked by 2 people

      • Teresa May May 15, 2018 / 10:42 pm

        You wouldn’t know a Nazi if she slapped you in the face. The most well known are the Askenazi Jews…which actually means ‘half jew’ in Yoddish. Nazi just means ‘half person’ another word for goyim, cattle.

        Or did you mean National Socialist by any chance? Those lucky Germans who from 1933 to 1945 had 12 years of freedom from Jewish tyranny that we are suffering from and enduring now!

        If you had ever read Hertzl’s writings on Zionism you’d know that he intended Palestinians to share the land on Israel, share power and live together in peace and harmony. But like all your sort you never do your own research, you just swallow Jewish propaganda, hook, line and sinker.

        Israel is not a Zionist state. Israel is everything the Jews accused Hitler and National Socialists of being: war criminals, genociders and liars. Shills like you need your necks stretching.

        Liked by 1 person

  7. last unctives May 15, 2018 / 6:31 pm

    That was good intel .

    Liked by 1 person

  8. last unctives May 15, 2018 / 6:50 pm

    So Jez was bent ? Why does he look like some one from an episode of Callan? Ha ha bent , The Harrods Al Fayed London Group , yes a strange axis .

    Like

  9. Ciaran Goggins May 15, 2018 / 7:00 pm

    We are deeply into own goal territory. I disagree with what Mr Bedford-Turner said but the whole point of free speech is that it allows the Jewish (or any other) community the right of reply. Odd that the far right are not putting some of the judiciary into the stratosphere.

    Liked by 3 people

  10. last unctives May 15, 2018 / 7:01 pm

    MI5 should just pay off the so called Nazis like they did with many others , a promise to stay out of the Auschwitz game, a simple agreement that is clear cut more effective than all this legal rubbish

    Like

    • Alison Chabloz May 16, 2018 / 10:58 am

      In Heritage & Destiny issue 79, Andrew Brons (former BNP MEP) writes:

      It is in the War of Ideas that it will sometimes be necessary for the protagonists from the Nationalist side to be somewhat distanced from political Nationalists.

      Those who pursue revisionism in twentieth century history should realize that connections between political nationalists and historical revisionism do no good to either side.

      Frankly, I can’t see the point of nationalism if we don’t tackle the reason why nationalism is suppressed (by organisations like Prevent, by our corrupt politicians, by the police, by the media and by the ‘justice’ system).

      Revisionism is at the heart of our struggle for freedom. Certainly, nationalism in the UK is infiltrated to such an extent that growth and progress seem impossible. Some of these infiltrators may be victims of blackmail, or other pressure regards family, work, etc.

      Over the past weeks, I’ve heard repeatedly from nationalist allies that they refuse to read left-wing sites. In the same manner as Brons, this blinkered approach is misguided. It does no good to talk about ‘sides’ when it comes to nationalism and revisionism – we cannot have one without the other.

      It’s not Mi5 which should be offering bribes. Most prominent members of our own elitist so-called nationalist-revisionist closed shop union are not revisionists per se – they need to take a long hard look in the mirror and realise that they are NOT the fairest of them all.

      Our movement needs revisionism and revisionists. Demolishing the Great Lie is the key to smashing the Globalist agenda once and for all. Otherwise, we are all doomed.

      Liked by 2 people

      • Sophie Johnson May 17, 2018 / 8:24 am

        Elegant, eloquent and spot-on, Alison. Thank you. The suppressors of free speech and of nationalism are exactly the same ugly lot. Nationalism and revisionism is ipso facto one movement.

        Liked by 2 people

  11. last unctives May 16, 2018 / 3:34 am

    Bribery ? Where living in a police state we Don’t have Freedom of speech , only their laws .I’m just being realistic , we may as well make some money out of it , will Jez be refusing Food and water in Prison ,? No. Been 15000 cases like this , what has it changed? They are in total control , of these legal swamps . We have no cards to play. Most people don’t give a damn about Freedom of speech unfortunately.

    Like

    • ivernazza May 16, 2018 / 6:48 am

      We have many cards to play. Never underestimated the power of SATURATION. When the point of saturation is reached, ‘laws’ previously accepted as valid lose all validity… Then a quote (from memory) by the late hero Ernst ZÜNDEL — keep this name in mind, for it will stay in History alongside that of another German hero Reinhold ELSNER — we now might call both these men “European heroes” –: better be a courageous man than a coward: “A courageous man dies once; a hero’s death; a coward (to which I add: ‘often doubling as a traitor’) dies every day of his miserable life”. The problem with severed testicles is that they haven’t been known to grow back.

      Liked by 3 people

      • ivernazza May 16, 2018 / 8:48 am

        Correction — for “ELSNER” please read “ELSTNER” (darn automated corrector)! At least it avoided chopping off the N…

        Like

    • thetruthnotdoctrine May 16, 2018 / 7:32 am

      In reality, they don’t have any laws, just Acts and Statutes which are the rules and regulations of The UK CORPORATION. These rules and regs only apply to the corporate citizen slaves (employees – fictions) of The UK CORPORATION. They do not apply to flesh and blood men and women. This is the scam that they pull over everyones eyes and has been going on since 1666.

      “Government is fictional; contracted into out of ignorance.”

      — Political Vel Craft

      “It is simply childish to say that a British government rules Britain.”

      — Sir Oswald Mosley.

      Liked by 2 people

  12. last unctives May 16, 2018 / 3:42 am

    Strange contrast recently Switching between Alison’s case and the incell truck attack in Toronto . The silence of the ((Alt Right , about it and

    Like

  13. last unctives May 16, 2018 / 3:59 am

    Continued/ and the silence of the soft neo Euro nats. Who has real revolutionary conciousness ? Suddenly I saw why nationalism will never be able to break through tied to language and identity which has no meaning for most., Arguments about things that have been long dead. Incell however has been mainstream and pretty much the hot issue for a month since it emerged from its own bubble. In fact incell makes all other politics especially the Kiked Alt Right look like bullshit. Suddenly I saw why their equation works but the Alt Right and its neo Nats in Europe are utterly outmoded tiresome boring an

    Like

  14. last unctives May 16, 2018 / 4:05 am

    Continued) and riven with absurd factions. All those years of failure have taken their toll , but a mere 22 year old with autism has commanded international media attention even frenzy!!!! What does that tell you about the theory of NS today ?

    Like

      • Sophie Johnson May 16, 2018 / 9:36 am

        Aha! Of course! Beware the silence of the lambs! 🙂 (Thanks. I needed a laugh. xxx)

        Liked by 1 person

  15. ivernazza May 16, 2018 / 9:42 am

    I am glad that you LIKED it. I enjoy reading your reactions. Alright now… we have all had our fun… and the rodents have jotted down the names… Where to now?

    Liked by 1 person

    • Sophie Johnson May 16, 2018 / 8:18 pm

      Strange thing, Ivernazza, is that I had written a short text, then I saw your ‘Where to now?’ Here it is:

      HG Well’s Time Machine has to come to mind. It rather scared me as a kid. I met the Morlocks in the novel first, then in a film. Strangely, the film image stayed with me: a chasm opens, and ugly little Morlocks scramble out and capture some of the beautiful Eloi who are lounging about, delicately munching on choice fruits. The captured one does not put a fight, and the others make no move to help him. Indeed, they do not even seem to notice.

      And now this scene has come to life. We Eloi watched the ugly, nasty, bloodthirsty little Morlocks descend on Jez, and we did nothing. Please let us not leave it at that. Please let us organise a huge protest that accuses the judges Tomlinson and Arbuthnot of their failure to observe due impartiality, and the CPS of scurrilous pandering to the Jews (the CAA in particular). PLEASE WILL AN ORGANISER OR A FEW COME FORWARD! I volunteer to do any hack work, foot work – anything asked of me that I am equipped to do.

      Let’s do it Jez style – in smart clothes, clutching well written flyers and placards. Let us impress the public.

      Liked by 1 person

  16. last unctives May 16, 2018 / 12:34 pm

    I can see why Brons said that , voter opportunities ect , all that soft ethnoism of the BNP which has totally failed ect with out the Revisionism , But it failed with the Revisionism under John Tyndall before that. So with or without it doesn’t work . The problem was that nationalism was really made illegal by the race relations act 1976. It has never recovered from that , fatally the NF never turned to the Gun . Nationalists dance around this legacy of betrayal. Does nationalism have any historical reality in the present day ? I doubt it now . Things have moved on , but not in to some nice soft ethnoism , funny it was so user friendly , so middle class , how come it didn’t work? Other identities have been created , in the meantime and they are the extreme inverse of anything out of Brons . Pure Revisionism should probably avoid politics ,or always clarify its position ? Are you a Revisionist first and something else 2nd ect . Like I said identities. The best equations are not coming from nationalism anymore , haven’t in a long time . As Lenin said : if you do not have the correct Theory you have nothing. That’s why I mentioned incell , it fits this historical moment like a glove , and it’s Armed . Their Theory is objective correct . Nationalism is silent on the matter. Panders to the Femist vote, even though Nationalism is known for its scarcity of women activists.

    Liked by 1 person

    • Alison Chabloz May 16, 2018 / 8:15 pm

      Leftist historian Dr Larry O’Hara runs a fascinating publication, Notes From The Borderland, which must be under intense scrutiny (as I’m sure this blog is too).

      Amongst other areas of political interest, O’Hara specialises in Mi5 and GCHQ infiltration of various groups and, despite his self-professed ‘anti-fascist’ leaning, he is utterly scathing of Searchlight and Hope Not Hate. He claims to possess intelligence service handlers’ reports of several ‘far right’ figures. Check this – about half way down.

      Liked by 1 person

    • ivernazza May 16, 2018 / 8:23 pm

      I believe that I understand what you are driving at. However a quick look at ‘democrassy’ (I stopped believing on Mickey-mouses when reaching the age of fourteen — remember the Roman switches of togae and the steps towards chivalry: 7-14-21? — fourteen when I decided that I would go NS instead) will tell you what is the “fond de commerce” of the ‘system’… and the little guys who are busy running. Just look around (or watch TV): Vulgarity, vile instincts, ugliness, facilty, dirt, lousy cocktails, abandon of all natural laws, and above all the law of proper political correctness… In other words, ‘democracy’ hangs onto the vote — when make-belief elections are called for — appealing the most to grob human stupidity.

      Can you beat that?

      If you believe that you can, you don’t have to call yourself a “national socialiste” just to please me, but please make sure not to label yourself a democrat. And if you are both capable and genuine, I’ll be the first to support you.

      And then, the two of us will take on the rest of them.

      Liked by 3 people

      • Alison Chabloz May 16, 2018 / 9:34 pm

        At last weekend’s fête, I sang Suzy Solidor’s version of Lili Marlène. They loved the tournée anecdote.

        Another memorable moment came after lunch on Sunday when the women who had all worked so hard to prepare and serve the food were thanked. In response, the women stood together and gave a Roman salute.

        I will email you.

        Liked by 2 people

  17. Fredrick Toben May 17, 2018 / 1:16 pm

    When it comes to the “Jewish problem”, I tend to rely on one of German philosopher Martin Heidegger’s concise maxims that points to a cultural origin of Judaism:

    The Jews, with their marked gift for calculating, live, already for the longest time, according to the principle of race, which is why they are resisting its consistent application with utmost violence.

    Although racial DNA tests have proliferated for decades in an effort to find that elusive “Jewish DNA”, the results have only proven that the majority of individuals who claim to be “Jewish” are from the Middle East and not from a European racial stock:
    – and then this from Adolf Hitler’s Mein Kampf:
    “The state is a community of living beings who have kindred physical and spiritual natures. …The instinct for the preservation of one’s own species is the primary cause that leads to the formation of human communities. Hence the state is a racial organism, and not an economic organization. The difference between the two is so great as to be incomprehensible to our contemporary so-called ‘statesmen.’ That is why they like to believe that the state may be constituted as an economic structure, whereas the truth is that it has always resulted from the will to preserve the species and the race.”

    Liked by 3 people

    • Sophie Johnson May 17, 2018 / 6:49 pm

      ‘That is why they like to believe that the state may be constituted as an economic structure, whereas the truth is that it has always resulted from the will to preserve the species and the race.’

      Fredrick, Hitler ignored what the modern state had been for some two centuries, and propounded a view of what the state should be. ‘The modern state’ is far more realistically glossed by Max Weber as that entity that has the monopoly on the use of force. (No question of race or its preservation arises here.) After all, the modern state almost never contains only ‘the’ (one) race: throughout recorded history, the state has absorbed races when it acquired territory by force (a very common practice of the powerful). And, as we see all too clearly in our own time, ‘the state’ exerts force in all areas of the life of its subjects, as have totalitarian states, and as does our own ‘democrassy’ (hello, Ivernazza!). So the modern state is ‘the wielder of force’, not ‘the preserver of race’. The latter concept of ‘state’ is pretty much useless to us as we survey the once-European lands.

      ‘The state’ can never be the preserver of ‘the race’ unless ‘the race’ is indeed the monopoliser of force in that state. But the race that holds the monopoly on force in a state is far from necessarily the indigenous race. We see that clearly in this country, among many others. So the bottom line is that ‘the state’ in its pre-Weberian sense is neither here not there. ‘State’ is shorthand for ‘the holder of the monopoly on force in a geographic territory’. Where that race is not the indigenous race, the latter is fully within its rights to challenge the monopoliser. But that does not entail that the indigenous race cannot be challenged. It can, and has been, successfully, as we see throughout the Western world. It’s just that the Europeans of the states of the Western world slept through the challenge and lost their monopoly on force, and with that, their states. Extraordinarily, one identifiable race (and that need not be taken in the sense of any kind of anthropological unit) has seized the monopoly of force in all those states. Then again, that ‘race’ is not uniform, and not all its members are wielders of force, nor do they aspire to be. So when our race challenges that race to take our states back, we are not being racist at all, for we are challenging only the wielders of force who are ensconsed where we think we have the right to be the monomolisers of force.

      Liked by 2 people

      • ivernazza May 17, 2018 / 7:18 pm

        There is also one point which the self appointed ‘élites’ of the ‘World Governance’ are too presumptuous to take into consideration in their maniac ‘dreams’; a point which the Germanics have inbred in them as a remnant o their archetypal tribal system: a mere question of manageable scale. It is of course, another law of nature, alongside the fact that no tree every reaches to the sky — people who have experienced the promethean madness of the kilometer-high architectural nonsenses in the Arabic Gulf will instantly know what I mean — Wolf knew this by instinct and common sense: when a pack of wolves gets too numerous it splits into two separate halves, manageable packs remaining subjects of the same eternal natural rules. This is why I am elated to forecast that their ‘globalization’ Folly (small g, capital F) will fail. Of course, they won’t let go easily off their world domination phantasm. Therefore brace!

        Liked by 2 people

        • Sophie Johnson May 17, 2018 / 8:14 pm

          ‘I am elated to forecast that their ‘globalization’ Folly (small g, capital F) will fail.]

          Vellet Deus, vellent dii.

          Liked by 1 person

          • ivernazza May 17, 2018 / 8:29 pm

            Sophie, I have noticed that — like some others in these columns – you make use of an hushed up WMD… it is called ‘humour’ (I, myself, keep a very tiny antiquated and worn exemplary of these weapons… for self-protection against mass insanity) don’t ever declare it; it’ll soon be declared unlawful.

            Liked by 2 people

            • Sophie Johnson May 18, 2018 / 8:02 am

              Surely, if we listen carefully, we realise that humour is already unlawful: It can offend someone like a variety of bodily harm, don’t-you-know.

              Liked by 1 person

  18. last unctives May 17, 2018 / 2:27 pm

    The prosecution didn’t have to prove that Jez had the intention to cause offence . Only the act as seen by others or the court deciding that the context of his act was offensive. Obviously anything could be offensive. Obviously this is fucking insanity worse than if they had actually banned Revisionism. In effect the have but by the back door , personally I would rather be banned as a Revisionist . At least it would be clear. The concept of even the most basic logic or evidential proof has totally collapsed in English law . You have to be fucking telepathic in order not to offend the police state . What a nation of fucking degenerates . I would rather be banned out right , totally banned than fucked around ,in obscure Kafkaesque trials that are utterly offensive to human reason. Has a single jury got the slightest clue as to the total insanity they are being told by this Spanish inquisition of a prosecution and mentally retarded Judge ? What utter madness.

    Liked by 1 person

  19. last unctives May 17, 2018 / 2:37 pm

    There’s no such thing as the Semitic race so of course there’s no DNA .

    Like

  20. ivernazza May 17, 2018 / 2:59 pm

    “Kafkaesque” is the word… or to keep with English tradition, your justice (small j) has reached a sufficient level to establish “Monty Python’s” as a distinguished new law school:

    “Crucifixion? One cross each; to the left row…”
    — Err… I’m not really Christian… I’m Jewish — and don’t you call me a Big Nose!”
    — Oh! Sorry, sorry, sorry (goes on all fours; kisses the lad’s feet and bang his own head — very roughly — with a plank; puts back his wig on and resumes his sorting).”

    I believe that Douglas Reed has written somewhere that every decent English household has a comfortable place next to the pet’s cushion by the mantelpiece to keep it’s Jew happy.

    Liked by 2 people

  21. Sophie Johnson May 17, 2018 / 3:40 pm

    Although I have urgent work, I keep leaving it to take stabs at researching the law. Here is one interesting point I came upon:

    The decision of a Crown Court judge does not create a legal precedent, (i.e., it has not become law). A legal precedent can be established by the Crown Court only if the preciding judge is a High Court judge.

    Now I wonder whether Judge Tomlinson made his biggish number of appealable moves precisely because he was gambling on an appeal, and a High Court judge to hear it? The empty case against Jez could then have been turned and twisted into a plausible decision that brings down a legal precedent. But would a High Court judge have stooped to dignifying the shabby case against Jez?

    Liked by 2 people

  22. last unctives May 17, 2018 / 3:46 pm

    If I say something and my context for saying it , would like the Jews to leave the country -because ect , are ignored and have no validity and are replaced by the context of Jewish offence as the only context of interpretation then this is already far worse than if they had totally banned any free speech about Jews in total . In Jez’s case it was an action / speech deemed a preparation for a crime , he never commited ,there were no victims , a victimless crime , intent did not have to be proven! . The mere act of speech was deemed criminal!!!! Utterly staggering , can you imagine the absolute criminal degeneration of the legal vermin that concocted this bastard’s obscenity in an English court.? This is pure Talmudic law not an English court of English laws !!!! Shocking obscenity of obscenities blatantly under the whip of Talmudic law in England 2018 . !!!!! We are under Talmudic law . We are totally fucked !!!

    Liked by 3 people

  23. Henry B May 17, 2018 / 8:39 pm

    Reed, who was no fan of the Nazis, was well ahead of the game with his 1938 book title “Insanity Fair” and continued to name the Jew-at-large throughout the war.

    Liked by 3 people

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

w

Connecting to %s