It’s been an exciting although somewhat tiring weekend. Up with the lark yesterday, Eurostar to Paris to attend the IVth Forum de l’Europe where I had been invited to speak in the afternoon and sing in the evening. Today, Sunday May 13th, I also attended a Parti Nationaliste Français demo in honour of St Jeanne d’Arc.
As and when reports arrive I will share more information and hopefully a couple more photos and videos.
The pace remains intense as tomorrow, Monday May 14th I will be back at Westminster Magistrates for the umpteenth time. Rendez-vous at the usual place and time.
Surely no cohencidence [sic] that Jez Turner will be in the dock at the same time also tomorrow morning at Southwark Crown Court for the judge’s final summing-up? A verdict is expected at 2pm.
Barrister Adrian Davies is no stranger to pressure, and your support at both hearings would be greatly appreciated. Let’s have two full public galleries for this double bill and show the powers-that-be that we will not be intimidated.
First, they came for the patriots…
By Robert Henderson
[AC: Many thanks to Robert for this account of last week’s Trial Part 1. Robert is no stranger to the negative effects of the UK’s speech laws. For more information, check out his blogs in the links below.]
The trial of Alison Chabloz day 1 – 10 1 2018
Presiding: District Judge John Zani sitting without a jury
Karen Robinson – Prosecuting counsel
Adrian Davies – Defence counsel
Witnesses for the Prosecution
Gideon Falter, chairman of the Campaign Against Antisemitism (CAA)
Stephen Silverman Director of Investigations and Enforcement CAA
Continuing from my previous post, as well as from the main topic of my recent videos, i.e. YouTube censorship, I feel it is necessary at this point to dwell somewhat on the double standards imposed by certain countries regards freedom of expression, especially when it comes to one particular historical event, namely, the ‘Holocaust’.
According to Wikipedia, 22 nations have laws which forbid either explicit denial of the ‘Holocaust’ or else denial of genocides in general. Although the list in part mirrors YouTube’s censored list, there are several notable exceptions: Russia, Spain, Portugal, Liechtenstein and Bosnia and Herzegovina. Why are these nations resistant to YouTube’s legal complaints? And how come Bulgaria, Croatia, Estonia and the United Kingdom figure on the list when these countries do not have any anti-revisionist laws?
Subjected to further censorship on YouTube, in this video I have translated a recent upload by Vincent Reynouard who helps us understand why revisionism is crucial to the struggles we face.
I re-uploaded the intro to my original video which has now been censored by YouTube, including in my home country the United Kingdom. In anticipation of my adversaries making a fraudulent complaint, I prepared a separate short clip, instructing viewers who want to continue watching to go to BitChute where the full version is now uploaded with revised subtitles in the French-spoken sections.
Link to full version also below. Please feel free to download, share, mirror and use on your platforms.
Asides attempting to secure a conviction by arguing that a hyperlink posted to a blog page constitutes sending grossly offensive material, the prosecution will also have to persuade the judge that the content of my songs is indeed grossly offensive.
A difficult task, when there exists no legal definition of grossly offensive, not to mention an array of examples which would suggest that it is I, myself, who is being targeted rather than my songs.
By and large, the general public accepts the given narrative of WW2. The victors get to write history, thereafter ensuring that their version of events is reinforced by way of education, media and, in particular, the funding of onside lawmakers who will eventually be persuaded to bring about legislation that will effectively silence dissenting views. Here in the UK, my court case proceedings show that we are teetering on the brink of a ‘Holocaust’ denial law, as it were, being ushered in through the back door. Nevertheless, if I am found guilty in January, the appeal process will be used, if necessary to the highest level. A brief update of Monday’s hearing can be found here.
Writing at Christmastide is unhealthy according to Simon Danczuk. Perhaps the disgraced former Labour MP for Rochdale spends his Christmas comforting the many victims of his predecessor, child abuser Cyril Smith? Or would Danczuk rather be festively indulging himself in seedy affairs with women young enough to be his granddaughter?
What would Danczuk’s opinion be, I wonder, of those who spend their Christmas trolling anonymously online?