Filleted, grilled, emotionally battered, but still undefeated.

180309 adrian alisonReasons for the enemy wanting ever stricter bail conditions became clearer last Wednesday. First imposed December 2016 by Friend of Israel DJ Emma Arbuthnot (recused), I have now been on bail for 15 months. Last autumn’s Freedom of Information request provides ample confirmation of Crown witness and CAA Enforcer Steve Silverman‘s determined efforts to have me locked up for breach of bail, thus obtaining a police interview which could be used against me in court. Much of the questioning in fact centred on my answers to Sgt Jon Lloyd regards my song Too Extreme For The BNP for which no charges have been brought. I think on the whole press coverage was pretty fair: selective in parts, for sure, but Jenni Frazer actually manages to call me a performer – a giant step forward. Hurrah!

Above: Barrister Adrian Davies and Alison Chabloz leaving court. Photo Colin Bex.

Continue reading

Implication of the Prosecution’s case is that Truths could be illegal

By Robert Henderson

[AC: Many thanks to Robert for this account of last week’s Trial Part 1. Robert is no stranger to the negative effects of the UK’s speech laws. For more information, check out his blogs in the links below.]

The trial of Alison Chabloz day 1 – 10 1 2018

Presiding: District Judge John Zani sitting without a jury
Karen Robinson – Prosecuting counsel
Adrian Davies – Defence counsel
Witnesses for the Prosecution
Gideon Falter, chairman of the Campaign Against Antisemitism (CAA)
Stephen Silverman Director of Investigations and Enforcement CAA

Continue reading

Response to Matt Broomfield in The Independent

Broomfield did not have the courage to publish my comment below his article which appeared late last Sunday. Suspecting this might be the case, I made a copy. Firstly, here’s Broomfield’s section about me:

170507 alison independent

My unpublished comment:

As Matt Broomfield would appear to have sympathy for the plight of the Palestinian people, it seems rather strange that he omits to mention references I made about Palestine in my songs and in my talk.

In fact, no doubt relying on memory, Broomfield also manages to misquote, misinterpret and mislead in regard to what I actually said that day. My performance was scripted and was filmed – although not uploaded to YouTube for reasons of jurisprudence.

I most certainly did not say I was in trouble “just for writing a few songs offensive to Jews”, nor did I add any “Come on!” following my remark about Professor Faurisson’s 88th birthday in Vichy.

Most perplexing of all is that this meeting took place three months ago in February, which perhaps partly explains Broomfield’s misquotes and omissions. The judge mentioned recused herself over a month ago and although I am certainly still on bail, this is not the same as being ‘out’ on bail.

Rather than play Kosher Brother, perhaps Broomfield could have investigated why British police closed their investigation into the online harassment and death threats I’ve received since 2015 – investigation closed just two weeks before I was arrested by the same police force for writing a couple of songs? Now that would have been some proper journalism – rather than the poisonous garbage he chooses to spread here.

Then again, Broomfield perhaps believes my grandfather, great-grandfather and countless others who died fighting for this country were fighting so that Brits would face prosecution in their own land for writing satirical songs which upset Jews? Would the author also argue that these men fought and died in order to give queer men the right to marry and adopt children?

And for all those on this thread rambling on and on about the ‘Holocaust’, why not show some proof – or at least accept an honourable debate – rather than trying to criminalise opinions.


Update: will Tommy ‘none of my friends and family are white’ Robinson be turning up at Broomfield’s house with a video camera? 

170509 robinson whine

Shoahism, Censorship and the Liberal Left

Yesterday, I received 50 legal request takedown notices from YouTube, informing me that my entire library of uploads spanning the past ten years has been removed in Austria, Switzerland, Czech Republic, Germany, France, French Guiana, Guadeloupe, Israel, Italy, Martinique, New Caledonia, French Polynesia, Poland, Saint Pierre and Miquelon, Reunion, French Southern Territories, Wallis and Futuna, Mayotte.

That’s approximately 260 million potential viewers who, if they’re not computer-savvy, are now deliberately deprived of my audio-visual output, whether it’s a subtitled translation of news from other revisionists, almost forgotten songs or short gardening tips. Account managers at the legal firm which issued the requests will be no doubt be satisfied, along with (((whoever))) ordered them to do the dirty on my entire channel. Or perhaps YouTube simply became fed up receiving multiple requests from whining lobbyists and just banned the whole lot in one go?

It’s hard to feel pleased about losing so many potential viewers in this way. At least, it can be said that this new dose of mass censorship of my work once again shows I must be doing something right.

Perhaps the legal action came about following my recent ban from Facebook during which I uploaded several videos on the plight of German revisionist and hero of our times, Horst Mahler. Sentenced to ten years and two months in prison, Mahler was freed under caution in 2015 after an untreated wound on his left foot became infected, meaning he had to undergo amputation below the knee. Always the rebel, Mahler gave a speech last January which is truly inspiring. You can find the subtitled version here and my shorter uploads on the same subject here. My first upload is now approaching 12,000 views in just 12 days which won’t have pleased lobbying organisations. Alfred Schaefer’s voiceover version of the same video was shared on platforms such as Renegade Tribune, further helping to raise awareness of Mahler’s situation and the utter hypocrisy of draconian thought crime laws which exist in so-called free, democratic nations. It just goes to show how desperate our traditional enemies are when the wheels of justice are set in motion in order to silence an 81-year old amputee: in these same countries, rapists and murders get off with far lighter sentences.

Censorship of this kind – initiated as ever by the same traditional enemy – is only to be expected and should be taken as a shining badge of honour. It costs them both time and money. Regards Mahler’s message, the banning of my videos also came too late as Mahler has managed to flee Germany and is now in a safe place from where he intends to seek political asylum.

However, should censorship – and indeed self-censorship – coming from those on the Liberal Left be taken equally seriously? I’ve tweeted (when I still had a Twitter), written and sung about Ken Livingstone and the Haavara Agreement. I also supported, among others, Jackie Walker when she became a target of the Israel lobby for pointing out the major role played by Jews in the Transatlantic slave trade as well as asking why the Holocaustᵀᴹ was privileged in comparison to other [verifiable] genocides. However, my sympathy for the Left stops short when, in return for my words of support, I am treated with even more contempt by these Liberal Leftists than I am by our traditional enemy lobbyists.

Hailing from mid-Wales, Mike Sivier is a Labour candidate in next week’s local elections. He also writes a blog Vox Political. Sivier is the latest victim of the Campaign Against Antisemitism’s all-out dastardly scheme to silence anyone they dislike. Alongside the lesser sins of criticising Israel and Zionism as well as voicing support for Livingstone, Sivier had had the gall to quote Gilad Atzmon. Worse still: yesterday in response to a typical CAA smear op, Sivier posted a blog in which he was misguided to the point of including a quote from yours truly.  As if citing far right Holocaust denier Atzmon wasn’t bad enough, Sivier now collaborates with a genuine Nazi!

170427 genuine Nazi

To be fair, Sivier did have the guts to publish my comment and he even replied. However, to all intents and purposes, Sivier must have quickly begun to reflect on what was more important: truth or his own fledgling political career. His final answer to my second comment says it all: Sivier is a Shoahist who believes Jews should be treated differently from the rest of us. My further replies are still awaiting moderation

170427 sivier blog

As Canadian free speech advocate Paul Fromm recently said: if you can’t name the problem, then the problem can’t be solved. The enemies of free speech grow evermore desperate to suppress the truth and the more they try, the deeper the hole they dig for themselves. Revisionism and the truth about what really happened during World War Two can no longer be suppressed. In terms of advertising and marketing, society will soon reach tipping point and the true, verifiable version of history will be adopted by the masses.

Using smear tactics to silence political enemies and the law to replace the concept of true or false with the concept of what is acceptable or unacceptable to Jews – Shoahism or antisemitism – has had the opposite effect to the one originally intended. Sooner rather than later, more people will start to seek the truth and speak out. As always, our traditional enemy could have avoided all this happening. Alas, they never learn.

(((The People))) Attempting to Stab British Voters in the Back

By Dr. Andrew Joyce.

Much ink has recently been spilled on the efforts of the Mischon de Reya law firm to “derail” Brexit. Considerably less attention has been paid to its very Jewish origins and ethos. The firm was founded by the son of a rabbi in 1937 and has made a habit of finding its way into influential cases dealing with facets of cultural marxism including, but not limited to, the redefinition of marriage, ‘racial discrimination,’ and ‘race relations.’ The Daily Mail (link below) reports that the firm, which has been accused of “treason,” “would not name any clients linked to its Brexit action – and would not confirm if it had worked for free.” However, it also reports that one of the most influential figures in the current effort is Jewish property speculator Alex Chesterman.

The Jewish Chronicle reported back in June that one of Mischon de Reya’s directors, Lord Pannick QC, who is also Jewish, complained to the Royal Courts of Justice that his staff had been subjected to “anti-Semitic abuse” for their actions against Brexit (the majority of de Reya partners being London or New York Jews). It is truly a sign of the times that Pannick’s panic was, sadly and predictably, heard by the equally Jewish Sir Brian Leveson. Pannick asked Leveson whether the names of claimants should be redacted, given the abuse, saying: “People have been deterred from [making legal claims].” By this, Lord Pannick must surely have inferred that Jews have been hindered in the attempts to co-ordinate an influential assault on Brexit. The Jewish Leveson of course acceded to the request of the Jewish Pannick, with the result that the anti-Brexit backstabbers are now operating behind a legally imposed veil.

What is Mischon de Reya hiding? Who comprises their client list? Who is stabbing the British in the back?

Of course, one of the more infamous of Mischon de Reya’s current crop of lawyers is Anthony Julius. While studying English literature at Cambridge University between 1974 and 1977, Julius placed himself “among those Jews who have sought out anti-Semitism.” He admits to becoming part of a “radical faction” which emerged in the humanities at that time, and that he was heavily influenced by his reading of “Freud … and the line of Western Marxist thinking that can be traced from the Austro-Marxists through to Antonio Gramsci and the Frankfurt School.” After graduating Julius went to law school and, when he finished there, he started his career as an ethnic activist by becoming chief lawyer to the British Board of Deputies of British Jews, an organization comprising elements of both the American Jewish Committee and the Anti-Defamation League. In 1983 he successfully defended the Board of Deputies when it was sued by a Conservative Party candidate. The Board of Deputies had conducted a propaganda campaign, distributing flyers in the candidate’s constituency during a General Election detailing his previous involvement with the National Front, an association the Board of Deputies claimed was evidence of the man’s anti-Semitism. In 1992, after he was expelled from Canada, David Irving applied for access to the documents which provoked his expulsion under Canada’s Access to Information Law. Among these documents “Irving claimed, was a dossier on his activities compiled by the Board of Deputies of British Jews and sent to the Canadian authorities. Irving wanted to sue for libel, but Julius, who acted for the Board, said that Irving was ‘sadly too late’ in filing the proper papers.”

Troll strangler banned from Twitter

Following last month’s successful London Forum appearance at the Grosvenor Hotel, I am now the centre of attention as far as Twitter is concerned because I have once again been banned.

It’s getting to be a habit. In one way, I’m glad. I was spending too much time
on Twitter much to the detriment of other, more purposeful activities – like
writing. Proper writing.

I doubt there’ll be any press commentary, but at least the trolls seem happy, in
their own sweet way.

My suspension was the result of stating that I’d pay good money to see a rope
around Nemo’s neck. I indulged myself, it’s true and his reaction was, as usual,
predicatable and a source of great merriment.

They’re such sensitive little souls, aren’t they, poor maggots. They wouldn’t
dare harm a fly. Of course not!

Flies – and indeed maggots – can move easily from the UK to the continent or even farther afield, by plane or boat…

Last week, I received an email from a friend in Canada with a copy of a letter
from Twitter, informing him that the French CRIF Jew lobby was threatening
Twitter with legal action, because of one of his tweets hosting a link to my
song: “Nemo’s Antisemitic Universe“. Quelle coincidence!

A week earlier, I received a rather strange email from Eric Hunt who apparently
now falls into the Cole/Irving/Weber camp of semi-revisionism which adheres to the belief that that the Holocaustᵀᴹ happened, but just not at Auschwitz. Even Vanessa Fuery agrees, which – considering our tweet history – is quite a confession.

Certainly, the schnaps will be flowing this evening in Barnet ! Jubliation
and much gloating shall ensue till the early hours, all in the name of


Of course, I’m also angry and sad. Who wouldn’t be? But this is no time for
defeatism. There’s a fight ahead for those of us who treasure our national
interest and who want to protect our European culture and heritage from parasitical gangs and their money-printing overlords.

We must be strong and we must unite. Our bond with Europe must not be weakened by too much plaintive wallowing in the quagmire of Brexit and the EU. The next General Election will likely be fought on this very issue, despite Theresa May’s promises. Till then, groundwork is of the essence.

As an artist (my detractors can say what the f*ck they like, I don’t care)
it’s truly a great honour to be targeted in this way. Reaction to my work as well as repeated bannings suggest that my (((enemies))) know the true value of their “prize”. Maggots would much rather be abused than have scorn poured over them by means of satirical songs – especially performed by a strong female.

Death threat? Ha! Ha ha ha ha ha ha! Nemo – what a legend !

Police know exactly where I am. In fact, I dropped off the latest anonymous
postal deliveries at Glossop police station this afternoon. Not sure there’s much point: if there’s no record of anyone’s fingerprints in the police data bank, it seems they can’t investigate further. Hmmm. Well, we’ll see what my MP has to say about that.

My barrister friend warned me to be careful after my rope tweet. One of my biggest
problems is disliking being told what to do. He was right, of course, but a change is long overdue. If Twitter doesn’t reinstate me, then Twitter can go f*ck itself. 50 or so accounts won’t have much to do with me gone, so it’s really not my loss – with the exception of my dear followers, of course. I’ve lost one platform, but I will find others and several alternatives have already been suggested.

For nationalists (non-kosher, if you please) and others who may be reading this
post, among the first people to offer their support were a Pakistani and a Black British gay Jew. Something to chew on:

A Mob of Ziotrolls & Feminazis Swarm On @AJCTMusic

It seems attacks on Gentiles are kosher, whereas if an anonymous Jew-Zionist
troll is attacked by a Gentile, then the Gentile will be suspended. Jew-Zionist trolls can literally get away with murder, even when a tweet also contains blatant racism:

Equality? Free speech? Or is it discrimination? At the very least it’s a clear
case of double standards.

During the first 22 days of October, Nemo aka Sicaro has incessantly stalked my
Twitter account. This has been the case daily since August 2015 after my #quenelle in Edinburgh. Nemo is a snooper. Nemo uses his own search terms to smear me publicly from the safe-space of his cloak of anonymity. Nemo is a parasitic maggot.

This suspension occurred in almost the exact same way as the one dating back to March 2015. Also a Friday evening – I remember I was at a gig. There was no breach of Twitter rules there either, simply another case of targeted and coordinated mass reporting. Twitter’s automated report system was swung into action. No amount of appeals were effective. I simply had to start again from scratch.

This time, I made sure I had a back-up account with locked tweets which I
sometimes updated with new followers but which had lain dormant since July 2015.
However, maggots soon performed their tribal duty and whoosh! this morning that account had gone too.

What can I do? Probably nothing. Twitter Support must know who I am – even the
CRIF wants my songs removed – again showing how effective humour and satire
can be when dealing with maggots. Repeated suspensions, the banning of my Edinburgh show and from Glossop Labour Club all merely go to prove yet again that the ‘antisemitism’ argument is being used as a political weapon to insure and protect Zionist control of, well, everything.

Free thinkers are the last thing our enemies want. Are you a sensible conformist
who goes along with the idea that the Jooz are under no circumstances to be
scrutinised, let alone criticised? Then you’ll fit it nicely.

If you want some advice from Twitter, then why not ask any user featured
below: there’s a short descriptive to help you decide who might be the most useful. They’ll tell you what to believe, whom you can hate and abuse with impunity (that’d be people like me) and they’ll also let you know what will happen if you stray from the kosher path they’ve decreed everyone else must live by – ((( theirs ))).

@sicaro72 < professional troll, works for (((lobby)))
@TimGStevens < morbidly dull psychiatrist
@JCAinfo < screeching loon
@dubdanu < Antifa’s answer to Katie Hopkins, but uglier and chronically foul-
@liberalisland < Virtuous Twitter (((troll))), formely cheap Holocaust sales
woman – now a semi-Revisionist
@WomenDefyUKIP < sock account belonging to @liberalisland
@BedlamJones < On bail, reportedly.
@nick070473 < Silly sausage
@Dora_Chance < Self-loving hasbarista
@Caroline101061 < Professional troll
@SLATfascists < Moron
@RTingBot < Professional troll to the power of six million. Sock account of Andrea Urban Fox (see below)
@_AndreaUrbanFox < Butthurt in Shoreditch.
@cominskeynathan < Seething parasitic supremacist, hosted by unlucky Edinburgh.
Pelts those he dislikes with out-of-copyright Anne Frank Diaries.
@bored_rose < LOL
@JasnaBadzak < convicted fraudster.
@GB0nd < kosher nationalist
@mendelpol < delicate flower
@GarySpedding < Shabbos Goy or Israeli agent
@isupportisrael_ < name is self explanatory
@eonantisemitism < semi-literate fanatic extremist (Middle East Monitor)
@JRocker44 < some bloke from Bury
@Chirpys_Agent < (((idiot)))
@GemmaSheridan2 < (((foulmouthed idiot and JDL member)))
@nottsyossarian < irrelevant
@Never_Again_UK_ < Cheap Holocaust salesperson
@suzanneshine < professional victim, shill
@new_bluehand < comedy Zio “anti-hate” org
@BMouthPR < idiot
@mghots < thug
@ozzyalan < aussie thug
@Opensout < professional troll
@GillianLazarus < yiddische mama with large chip on her shoulder
@ShimonLevit < avid Zionist
@DrGabsEvans < cheap Holocaust saleswoman
@ravki12344 < supremacist
@engrugger < failed human being
@Just1Luca < parasite
@markoah < whiny delicate flower
@israellycool < idiot
@neshika_ < idiot
@realbobknot < some idiot bloke
@frankiescar < Zionist who’s always drunk
@ArfurZTowcrate < Zionist abuser
@simbarnett < Jew
@benmyers19 < Jew
@HilaryK777 < Jew
@BeaumontBee < Jew
@MomentumGod2 < professional troll
@gallowayexposed < professional troll
@corbynsnap < professional troll
@BHTech_Support < idiot
@Lifeonacanal < lame duck
@kravitzjonny < idiot
@muscledito < professional troll
@CommonSPaine < irrelevant
@denisbolton2 < irrelevant idiot
@thehugheslady < idiot
@inthesoupagain < spends its time promoting the very accounts it purports to
want to ban. Seems rather incoherent to me – it must want people to read VT, etc. No
surprise there then, seeing as the CEO of Veterans Today is a Zionist shill,
allegedly. Is Soup’s function to stir up hatred of Jews in the name of Zionism?

If anyone has any suggestions for further additions to the above list do drop me a line in the comments below.

Love and blessings to all. Free Palestine. Xx

Why do so many believe in the absurd Holocaustᵀᴹ myth?

Holocaust or Hoax by Jurgen Graf p.149-51

A question to which revisionists would like a convincing answer: What is the explanation for the irrational behaviour of an entire people which apparently believes in an absurd (Holocaust) legend (myth)?

The Holocaust – with its gas chambers which constantly change location; its millions of victims who disappear without a trace into blue vapour at Auschwitz, Majdanek and Treblinka, after being murdered by Hitler’s SS butchers, either with Zyklon B insecticide or Diesel exhaust, not to mention mass shootings Babi Yar-style (where the victims also disappear without a trace) – is, and remains, first and foremost a unique proof of the monumental stupidity of our age. In the early 1980s – when the major absurdities of the Holocaust swindle had already been exploded, with the exception of a few details – most revisionist researchers thought it inconceivable that the legend could persist more than a few more years. Since then, more than fifteen years have elapsed, and the Lie continues to drag out its existence, filthier and more luxuriant than ever! Cracks are appearing in the edifice of lies, doubts are appearing – here and there, in the press, in a few articles, in many private conversations – as to the truth of the Establishment version of the fate of the Jews under the Third Reich.

People mention the possibility of minor errors or exaggerations; but almost everyone continues to accept the story as basically correct. It is precisely this general acceptance which is the biggest puzzle to revisionists – and to any reasonable person with a minimum knowledge of history. Really, how can anyone of normal intelligence, for example, view the room which is shown to millions of tourists on the grounds of the former camp of Auschwitz as the “only Nazi gas chamber remaining in original condition”, without immediately realising that the physical capacity of the room – not to mention its immediate surroundings, for example, its proximity to the hospital located nearby – would make any mass execution using a highly dangerous poison gas impossible? The unspeakable atrocity stories spewed forth to visitors by officials of the Auschwitz Museum, deserve only ridicule. But the very opposite occurs: in these shrines dedicated to the Holocaust religion, people become intellectual cripples: awe-struck, their senses paralysed, they gape at everything as if it were plausible, and solemnly swallow nonsensical fairy tales! Even the generation of Germans which lived through the war – i.e., the “generation of criminals”, those who supported the National Socialist system which is now slandered all over the world, who remained true to that system and fought for it to the bitter end, with unprecedented self-sacrifice and devotion of spirit – that generation no longer knows what to believe after half a century of filth and lies.

They confuse their personal firsthand experience, that which they saw and experienced themselves, with that which they think they should have seen or experienced (according to the official version of history). Faced with the accusations and ignorance of succeeding generations, the generation of the war years joins in with the chorus of self-incrimination or takes refuge in resigned silence. And yet, – if the gas chambers were technically impossible and the whole story is therefore a lie; – if no material evidence of the crime remains, since the Nazis “destroyed all traces of their crimes at the last moment”; – if millions of bodies simply disappeared into blue vapour, so that not a single body of a single gassing victim has ever been found; – if the official version of history is based on nothing but contradictory “eyewitness testimonies” of witnesses who were never subjected to cross-examination, and confessions extorted from “criminals”; – if a forensic report, including a reconstruction as is ordinary practice in an ordinary murder case, has never even been attempted; – if expert reports on the technical feasibility of the mass gassings are never performed by the courts, but only on behalf of private parties, and if no technical refutation of these reports can be produced. Then how is it then possible for the world to believe this series of grotesque hallucinations?

If you ask these questions, most people are either surprised or shocked. But some people, particularly, young people – who often react spontaneously and emotionally – immediately and spontaneously declare their conviction that the Holocaust is absurd. One hears remarks like the following: “How could I have believed such nonsense for all those years?” The revisionist may perhaps be pleased in the belief that he has won a new adherent. But in most cases, this is a great mistake. When the shock wears off – the shock which sets in following the discovery of a new truth – the new convert returns to his old environment, where it is almost impossible to find any information on the subject other than all-pervading Holocaust propaganda. The average person lacks the courage to deviate from his environment; the mass media, of course, are all around us. Upon the slightest expression of doubts, the inevitable reply will be that he has spoken with a horrid, lying Nazi, that he has heard a load of lies, and that he had better forget everything he heard. This is particularly true, unless the convert is a hero willing to jeopardise his social and professional position for historical truth. Since even the crudest lie can be obfuscated and explained away, the heretic falls away from his new belief and returns to the shrine of the incredible. Credo quia absurdum est. What at first seemed absurd – in comparison to reasonable information about the absurdity of the Holocaust religion – once again seems convincing. In a society in which propagandists control the media, those who stray from the fold are quick to permit themselves to be persuaded once again that the unanimous opinion (Vox Populi, Vox Dei) which confirmed the reality of the mass extermination of the Jews for over a half a century, bears incomparably more weight than the statements of a single “Nazi”.

This abandonment of the elementary duty to seek the truth can, however, have unexpectedly unpleasant results. Today, even re-educated Germans – despite their anti-fascist fanaticism – are regarded with mistrust, even hostility, by many people in all parts of the world.

The Zionists and their stooges are skilful at ensuring the perpetuation of this hostility, for example, through hundreds of films, largely produced by Jews, which depict German soldiers either as simple fools or sadistic beasts.

The passivity and cowardice of the majority of the German people today is their decisive contribution to the perpetuation endless hatred. All of German contemporary history has been turned into a sort of crime sheet by the Allied victors. The Germans swallow everything in complete passivity.

A person who refuses to defend himself, ought not to wonder if he is found guilty. He deserves no respect, and should expect none. Germans compete with each other in vomiting upon their own people and themselves at the same time. Do they really expect to gain any sympathy abroad in this way?

Let us nevertheless attempt to understand the reasons for this apparently illogical behaviour on the part of the German people.

Perhaps the main reason for it is the knowledge, or instinctive sense, that any critical discussion of the so-called Holocaust is dangerous; it can cost the victim his job, his position in society, and even destroy his family. In addition, many people don’t want to know much about the Holocaust, which is the principal accusation against the German people, since they intuitively feel that many things about it simply cannot be true. They are afraid to know whether the Holocaust is a pack of lies, or just a lie or two; anyone doubting the details of the official version of history runs the risk of being compelled to question the story as a whole.

And that is just what our contemporaries, set on their peace and quiet and comfort at any price, do not want. On the other hand, it is not easy to live with a lie which one should long ago have recognised as such, and, at the same time, to act as if it were no lie at all. For example, how should the mother of a family, who knows to a certainty that the gas chamber yarn is a lie, answer a child who asks, eyes wide-open with wonder: “Mama, teacher told us that German soldiers gassed the Jews. Did Grandpa gas the Jews, too?” The best way to evade a question like that, which is complex and painful, is simply to know nothing. So the mother simply tells the over-curious child, “I don’t know, ask your teacher.”