How ‘anti-racism’ lobbyists are screwing the British public

Although no fan of Katie Hopkins, I do have sympathy with some of her views for the simple reason that she happens to be correct, sometimes. Take the latest scandal surrounding one of Hopkins’ provocative tweets which she was forced to delete following a typical onslaught by the usual virtue-signalling do-gooders’ failure to understand that ‘anti-racism’ is a code word for ‘anti-white’ :

170503 joly hopkins

(For the sake of argument, here I’m referring to Hopkins’ own words and not the TV series Dear White People).

Lebanese-born Dom Joly is a comedian which perhaps partly explains his outrage. Maybe he was just trying to be funny? Sadly, no. Joly believes that in Britain blacks suffer far more discrimination than whites. His outburst would appear to suggest that whites – and in this particular case, Hopkins – are more racist than any other race simply because of the colour of their skin. In which case, doesn’t that make Joly just as ‘racist’ as Hopkins?

Moreover, despite the implied meaning of Hopkins’ tweet being wholly justified, Joly provides no counter evidence whatsoever, preferring instead to slate Hopkins as an evil racist who has no right to exist, in full glare of his 220k Twitter followers. If Hopkins said Joly had no right to exist, she’d be accused of hate speech.

Is Joly in some twisted way really suggesting that indisputable statistics relating to black on black violent crime would somehow be further proof of whites discriminating against blacks?

Poor black people have suffered sooooo terribly and have been sooooo oppressed by evil, colonising whites that we must never blame blacks for continually beating and killing each other – it’s not their fault. Whites are the guilty ones! Just look at history!

Cue the Leftist Liberal segment of British society shrivelling yet again under the huge weight of white guilt imposed, this time, by a non-white stand-up comic. These virtue signallers then sing the praises of the latter whilst patting themselves on the back as Hopkins is forced to pull her opinion from public view.

As Hopkins’ deletion shows, speaking the truth is now a potential hate crime. Likewise and without exception, the main ‘anti-racist’ organisations in the UK are doing all they can to set legal precedents which will ensure that, in future, ethnic white Brits will be harshly punished for thinking aloud and stating verifiable fact.

Who are the people behind these ‘anti-racism’ organisations? I’ve already written about Fiyaz Mughal – former director of Islamophobia monitoring organisation Tell Mama – here. Suffice it to say that as well as trying to screw ordinary Brits, Tell Mama also does its best to mess with members of the very same community it claims to represent. With former CST Chairman Richard Benson as president, the fact that so many British Muslims have such little faith in Tell Mama is no real surprise.

Leaving aside Jewish lobbying group CST and militant wing CAA for the moment, I would like to concentrate on another ‘anti-racist’ organisation, Nick Lowles’ Hope Not Hate.

As well as functioning as a registered charity which receives government funding, Hope Not Hate is also a company whose directors include snivelling ex-Bicom Labour MP, Ruth Smeeth. Lowles and Smeeth are both perfect examples of the utter hypocrisy of such organisations which exalt the ideologies of multiculturalism and equality whilst keeping their professional interests strictly within their own kosher network.

Last month, the entire website archives of Hope Not Hate were wiped and, despite search results still appearing on Google, all past links now lead to 404s. Where, oh where have all Matt Collins‘ smear blogs gone?! Down the pan, along with Hope Not Hate’s ‘charitable’ status?

Does this wiping of years’ worth of archives have something to do with Lowles’ announcement also last month of his intention to sue Nigel Farage for a comment made on LBC radio last December? In response to a tweet by Brendan Cox (widower of murdered MP Jo Cox) describing Farage as an ‘extremist’, Farage said that Cox would know all about extremism because of his links with Hope Not Hate, an organisation which uses undemocratic tactics against its political enemies.

At the time, Lowles used his influence to persuade The Guardian to publish a whole swathe of articles condemning Farage from the likes of Owen Jones and, err, himself. Lowles’ piece trumpets ‘a huge response’ to his plea for donations required to serve justice on the despicable and hateful Farage. Five months on: Lowles re-launches Hope Hot Hate’s website, re-launches his intention to sue Farage and re-launches an appeal asking for £100,000 – also via The Guardian. On the original donation page from last December, a disclaimer reads that, in the eventuality of any settlement outside court, donated funds will be put to further good use battling hatred. If there was already a huge response last December, where’s the money now and why the need to set up a new fund?

And what about Brendan Cox’s role in all this? The last time I checked, the Jo Cox Fund had already overreached its target by almost £500,000 and the money is still flooding in. As Hope Not Hate is one of the fund’s main beneficiaries, why can’t Lowles dip into his part of the surplus – let alone into his part of the official target sum of £1.5m? Are Lowles and Cox taking the good-natured British public for a ride?

170503 jo cox

Perhaps afraid of pending legal consequences relating to his own organisation’s despicable record on targeting political enemies, Lowles should heed a similar case brought by Mughal against The Telegraph after columnist Andrew Gilligan also used the word ‘extremist’ in one of his articles to describe the then director of Tell Mama. Mughal lost his case, no doubt resulting in impending financial disaster for Tell Mama, thereafter heroically saved by the ensuing knight-in-shining-shekels arrival on the scene of Richard Benson.

Hope Not Hate’s dubious methods of trying to shame their political opponents into silence is common knowledge. Furthermore, Nigel Farage was criticising an organisation, not an individual.

Last night Hope Not Hate together with London Antifa managed to shut down a meeting of the Keep Talking Group which was due to host British author and historian Nick Kollerstrom speaking on the recent Westminster terror attack. Keep Talking is a non-politically aligned group which entertains speakers from a wide-ranging socio-political spectrum, including climate change skeptic, Piers Corbyn, and Danish false flag expert, Ole Dammergaard.

Hope Not Hate’s blog post, written by senior researcher Joe Mulhall (like Mughal, also a trustee at the Holocaust Memorial Day Trust) describes Kollerstrom as one of Britain’s ‘leading Holocaust deniers‘. In what way is last night’s attack – where an 80-year old attendee was injured – linked to last February’s similar assault at a London Forum meeting in Kensington? Is there any significance to the fact that the wiping of Hope Not Hate’s archives seems to coincide with Lowles now specifically targeting those associated with British nationalist intelligentsia and Jez Turner‘s London Forum? If so, then last night’s call out to Antifa gang thugs was surely a step too far?

‘Anti-hate’ groups which purport to uphold democratic values whilst behaving in direct opposition to such claims should be investigated – especially those masquerading as registered charities. These organisations’ main target is of course nationalism, which must not, at any cost, be allowed to flourish. ‘As we all know‘, pontificate Lowles, Cox, Mughal, Joly and an army of virtue-signalling leftist liberals, ‘Nationalism leads to death by insecticide poisoning on an industrial scale in gas chambers. Nationalism is the devil incarnate and those who partake must be burned at the stake – or at least executed socially and professionally. We will shut you down and burn all your books in the name of, err, anti-fascism.’

Don’t back the wrong horse and please don’t give your hard-earned money to traitorous scum who’ve grown rich and fat playing victim whilst tendering a begging bowl.  True patriotic nationalism transcends any traditional concept of Left-Right political ideology. The primary aim of organisations such as Hope Not Hate, aided and abetted by the corrupt creeps currently in power at Westminster, is to banish any nationalistic notion from the public psyche in the name of multicultural diversity, globalism and the status quo.

Rather than continuing to subscribe to failed dogma, it would be far more productive to write letters of complaint to the Charity Commission and to your MP. Even better, check out local nationalist groups and see what’s happening in your area. And if you really want to annoy the likes of Lowles and his Soros-funded Antifa thug cronies, come along to the next meeting of the London Forum.

(((The People))) Attempting to Stab British Voters in the Back

By Dr. Andrew Joyce.

Much ink has recently been spilled on the efforts of the Mischon de Reya law firm to “derail” Brexit. Considerably less attention has been paid to its very Jewish origins and ethos. The firm was founded by the son of a rabbi in 1937 and has made a habit of finding its way into influential cases dealing with facets of cultural marxism including, but not limited to, the redefinition of marriage, ‘racial discrimination,’ and ‘race relations.’ The Daily Mail (link below) reports that the firm, which has been accused of “treason,” “would not name any clients linked to its Brexit action – and would not confirm if it had worked for free.” However, it also reports that one of the most influential figures in the current effort is Jewish property speculator Alex Chesterman.

The Jewish Chronicle reported back in June that one of Mischon de Reya’s directors, Lord Pannick QC, who is also Jewish, complained to the Royal Courts of Justice that his staff had been subjected to “anti-Semitic abuse” for their actions against Brexit (the majority of de Reya partners being London or New York Jews). It is truly a sign of the times that Pannick’s panic was, sadly and predictably, heard by the equally Jewish Sir Brian Leveson. Pannick asked Leveson whether the names of claimants should be redacted, given the abuse, saying: “People have been deterred from [making legal claims].” By this, Lord Pannick must surely have inferred that Jews have been hindered in the attempts to co-ordinate an influential assault on Brexit. The Jewish Leveson of course acceded to the request of the Jewish Pannick, with the result that the anti-Brexit backstabbers are now operating behind a legally imposed veil.

What is Mischon de Reya hiding? Who comprises their client list? Who is stabbing the British in the back?

Of course, one of the more infamous of Mischon de Reya’s current crop of lawyers is Anthony Julius. While studying English literature at Cambridge University between 1974 and 1977, Julius placed himself “among those Jews who have sought out anti-Semitism.” He admits to becoming part of a “radical faction” which emerged in the humanities at that time, and that he was heavily influenced by his reading of “Freud … and the line of Western Marxist thinking that can be traced from the Austro-Marxists through to Antonio Gramsci and the Frankfurt School.” After graduating Julius went to law school and, when he finished there, he started his career as an ethnic activist by becoming chief lawyer to the British Board of Deputies of British Jews, an organization comprising elements of both the American Jewish Committee and the Anti-Defamation League. In 1983 he successfully defended the Board of Deputies when it was sued by a Conservative Party candidate. The Board of Deputies had conducted a propaganda campaign, distributing flyers in the candidate’s constituency during a General Election detailing his previous involvement with the National Front, an association the Board of Deputies claimed was evidence of the man’s anti-Semitism. In 1992, after he was expelled from Canada, David Irving applied for access to the documents which provoked his expulsion under Canada’s Access to Information Law. Among these documents “Irving claimed, was a dossier on his activities compiled by the Board of Deputies of British Jews and sent to the Canadian authorities. Irving wanted to sue for libel, but Julius, who acted for the Board, said that Irving was ‘sadly too late’ in filing the proper papers.”

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-3901568/Top-City-law-firm-led-High-Court-bid-stop-PM-triggering-Brexit-won-t-reveal-fat-cats-working-for.html

Nationalism is the only answer

Ethnic Europeans are being discriminated against in their own lands by minority groups. We only have to look at the recent disbarring of Ian Millard by the UK Bar Standards Board, as well as several high profile suspensions – including my own – from Twitter, to understand that there is no other explanation.

Time to wake up and to start fighting back. Today, it’s Millard, Vaughn, Yiannopoulos, Frith and Chabloz. Tomorrow, it’s you.

Blatant double standards of corporate social media groups are easily explained by looking at who owns these platforms and by observing which groups can use them to smear, threaten and abuse with impunity and which groups cannot. Can someone in London or Dublin please perform a quenelle outside Twitter‘s offices? If Twitter – and indeed the Solicitors Regulation Authority – are quite comfortable with Zionist lawyer Mark Lewis‘ public outbursts, then what harm in an anti-establishment comic salute ou deux?

160204-mark-lewis-lawyer

Why do abusive Zionists need protecting when, clearly, it’s us who need protecting from them?

Just as the illegal Israeli government continues to ethnically cleanse Palestine of native Arabs, so the international Zionist lobby aims to do the same to ethnic white Europeans in Europe and in every other part of the world inhabited by Europeans.

Progressive minds are not fooled by duplicitous, conniving, western mainstream media. Our parasitic controllers are very scared indeed. More and more people are waking up to the incontrovertible truth that they are the ones behind the immigrant invasion of Europe. In fact, more and more people are now realising that Jew-Zionists are pretty much responsible for all the evil that exists in the world today.

They have elevated themselves to positions of importance in finance, government, media and law. Laws are implemented in order to protect Zionist interests at the expense of our own nations, culture and heritage. Speaking or writing about these facts is not ‘hate speech’ or ‘persecution’. It’s the plain truth: it’s happening in front of our own eyes. ‘Diversity’ will eventually mean no diversity: white genes are recessive and white Brits are already a minority in the UK capital.

Being a white nationalist doesn’t mean other groups deserve to be hated. It’s the most natural thing in the world to want to protect and cherish one’s own kind. We need to start behaving in the same way ethnic minority groups behave in a foreign country and take back control.

161101 nationalism.JPG

Zionist-run media i.e. every title going – isn’t going to stick up for the interests of ethnic Brits. Neither are the treasonous hordes of SJW Shabbos Goy. If you’re still wringing your hands at any mention of the far right, just remember that Margaret Thatcher was elected after the Tories stole policies of the National Front. Theresa May has now done the exact same with UKIP policy. Remember, too, that 17.4m Brits voted for Brexit.

If you do not feel concerned about our basic freedoms being abused then perhaps the time has come to ask yourself why. Rather than pointing the finger at patriots, artists and academics and repeating ad nauseum the same Zionist buzzwords, isn’t it time you started defending your own origins, your own people and your own cultural and spiritual heritage, rather than those of a belligerent, hostile tribe?