A senior police officer meets with Jewish Shomrim vigilante police force and Twitter troll Bedlam Jones.
Since that fateful day in court last December, Jones has desperately sought ways to alleviate his discomfort. Alas, to no avail.
A senior police officer meets with Jewish Shomrim vigilante police force and Twitter troll Bedlam Jones.
Since that fateful day in court last December, Jones has desperately sought ways to alleviate his discomfort. Alas, to no avail.
Here is the Wikipedia entry on Full Spectrum Dominance (FSD):
Full-spectrum dominance also known as full-spectrum superiority, is a military entity’s achievement of control over all dimensions of the battlespace, effectively possessing an overwhelming diversity of resources in such areas as terrestrial, aerial, maritime, subterranean, extraterrestrial, psychological, and bio- or cyber-technological warfare.
Full spectrum dominance includes the physical battlespace; air, surface and sub-surface as well as the electromagnetic spectrum and information space. Control implies that freedom of opposition force assets to exploit the battlespace is wholly constrained.
As early as 2005, the credibility of full-spectrum dominance as a practical strategic doctrine was dismissed by Professor Philip Taylor of the University of Leeds an expert consultant to the US and UK governments on psychological operations, propaganda and diplomacy.
“It’s true, though rarely recognized in the control-freakery world of the military, that full spectrum dominance is impossible in the global information environment.”
I first became aware of FSD when I noticed that a quote from a blog about me was being used by Google and other search engines to describe my Facebook page.
— Paul David Mooney (@pdmoon8) October 6, 2016
The above descriptive of my Facebook page was written by Daniel Leons-Marder whose Twitter profile tells us that he is a soon-to-be lawyer and editor of Everyday Antisemitism – a blog set up by UK registered charity Campaign Against Antisemitism (CAA).
Let’s look at another example of FSD. In one of my recent posts, I quote two versions of a Wikipedia edit concerning my quenelle salute in Edinburgh last year. Now, as a description of this very blog, Google Search shows the original wiki insert which has since been edited for the following reasons:
“speculation, no prosecution of Chabloz” and “misleading comments, reporting someone to the police is not the same as claiming it is an investigation.”
Why is Google using a misleading, speculative Wikipedia insertion – edited no doubt to avoid potential legal consequences – to describe my personal blog? Because this is how FSD agencies operate online:
Chabloz’ quenelle and her revisionist songs are a grave threat to society. Normies, music agencies and indeed the entire world must be forewarned before having anything to do with Chabloz and her terrorist tunes!
Online FSD is clearly intended to asphyxiate its targets, both financially and professionally. My music constitutes a Level 6 [million] threat to UK-Israeli business interests. Thus, any potential further support for my art must be hastily quashed.
As with the French CRIF’s legal request to Twitter to take down tweets of my oh so threateningly subversive song, Nemo’s Antisemitic Universe, I strongly suspect that CAA – with its ties to UK government, police and regulatory bodies – is somehow involved in this FSD manipulation of web search terms. Of course, CRIF and CAA share the same tribal objectives. It is my opinion that the legal request sent to Twitter was the lobby’s way of letting both CAFE Director, Paul Fromm, and I know that (((they))) are on to us.
Since when were charities set up in order to intimidate private citizens and try to suppress freedom of speech on certain socio-political issues? CAA lobbies police to have people they disapprove of arrested and their computers and devices seized. These illegal raids occur with very little chance of prosecution – if any. They are intended to instil fear and stop political enemies of Zionism speaking out against Israel, Jewish ‘conspiracy theories’ and the obvious lies of the Holocaustᵀᴹ.
The possibility of suing police for false arrest is available for those with deep pockets. Bullies always target little people.
Twitter shines a clear light on the anonymous accounts working on behalf of CAA. One is Nemo – as featured in the above song: now @Sicaro72 – delicate flower who ran crying to Twitter and allegedly also to police when, after trolling and harassing me for more than a year, I tweeted about wanting to see a rope around his neck and was summarily suspended from Twitter. Another is Andrea Silva’s @RTingBot.
Both these accounts visit my blogs, Facebook, etc., regularly. They sometimes post screenshots of what they find here and there. This blog is monitored and therefore visitors’ IP addresses are visible. It’s fairly easy to keep track: time stamps of tweets correspond to blog hits, especially after posting a new article.
Careful analysis of IP addresses, phone / laptop models and Internet providers seems to show that both these anonymous troll accounts sometimes tweet from the exact same location just off Cheapside in the City of London. Mere coincidence? Or perhaps Shitfox and Sicko are in the throws of a forbidden, budding romance? There also seems to be a connect with Radlett in North London, affectionately known as The New Zion. If this information proves anything, it’s that our pair of Zio lovebirds can’t be that bright.
However, this is a serious issue. The role and function of lobbying organisations masquerading as charities must be called into question. CAA does not carry out charitable work. It is a fraudulent, pro-Zionist enterprise whose main purpose is to bait and entrap anti-Zionists online.
By way of deception and full spectrum dominance thou shalt do war.
Next Saturday, November 12 at 4pm GMT, I’ll be the guest on Dennis Fetcho’s Inside the Eye – Live! when I’ll be talking about FSD, CAA, my suspension from Twitter and about my upcoming CD. Do tune in! In contrast to dishonest (((Survivors))) as described in my song, I’ll be sticking to plain facts. Even if, as stated in a recent comment from user My7HiCalD4Rk, my song manages to debunk the Holocaustᵀᴹ, the fact that I’m still here and fighting is proof that it’s entirely possible to survive – and indeed thrive – even after being subjected to Full Spectrum Dominance.
Searching for news and views about free speech on Twitter, sheer numbers of tweets show that the topic is constantly trending. With regard to Twitter itself, the impression is not good – nor indeed for any of the other big social media platforms.
As for handling abuse, in my experience, Facebook has on several occasions removed content that I reported: on one occasion, a hate group set up in my name in 2012 was completely deleted; likewise with another recent post by a pro-Israel group inciting people to bully me.
My profile pictures on Facebook had been suddenly flooded with abusive comments. The same happened after my quenelle salute in Edinburgh last year. My ‘other’ Facebook inbox was also crammed with abuse. I since discovered that entire countries can be blocked from seeing pages on Facebook. No prizes for guessing which illegal state is on my list.
Twitter’s report system, however, is arbitrary. Management already admitted they are unable to control abuse from trolls. Suspensions such as mine are a blatant example of how social media has killed free speech. Interestingly, although I’m not the only person to have been suspended, it now appears that certain banned users are allowed back whereas others are not:
Take Milo Yiannopoulos aka Nero, for example, who now tweets via his Facebook page. Ricky Vaughn is also back on Twitter again, having recuperated 10k followers in less than a month – a fact which won’t please Nero. My voice, however, remains censored whist Schadenfreude emanating from the Twitter Eruv continues to make itself heard, loud and clear.
The double standards are toe-curling, cringe-worthy and would be hilarious if they weren’t so worrying. Several people have remarked that, as a woman, I get far more abuse on Twitter than any man holding similar views and that this abuse against me comes principally from other women – a fact further reinforced by the above-mentioned Schadenfreude.
Recently, a Wikipedia editor using the name Nichebiographer published a wiki about me which was flagged for deletion and promptly removed. The same editor did however manage to insert a couple of sentences about me in the English entry on the Quenelle :
Use of the quenelle by British musician Alison Chabloz led to the first known police investigation into the quenelle, lending credence to the possibility that performance of a quenelle could be considered a criminal offence in Britain.
The above has since been edited by Philip Cross:
Use of the quenelle by British musician Alison Chabloz in August 2015 was the subject of complaints. However, the organisers of the Edinburgh Festival Fringe, where Chabloz was due to perform, said no action would be taken against her as it was not within their remit.
Reasons given for the edits were “speculation, no prosecution of Chabloz” and “misleading comments, reporting someone to the police is not the same as claiming it is an investigation.” Along with this little gem – shining like a beacon of common sense in a sea of filthy, muddying censorship – is Alain Soral’s recognition of my London Forum performance.
My detractors are uncharacteristically quiet, no doubt plotting ahead of my next scheduled alternative media live broadcast. By then, I hope to have one one track from my upcoming CD ready to be aired.
Are my detractors, along with Twitter Support, perhaps ready to ponder the consequences of their actions? Contrary to the original Wikipedia spin on my quenelle, there is a real, live, ongoing criminal investigation and police are regularly updated. Why have there been no press reports about this? I’m glad that pretty much everything has been recorded here on this very blog. If you want to believe Twitter, then I’ve already been arrested, am wanted for questioning, am on bail and about to be sectioned. As already seen in my previous blog, it’s fine for Zionists to use Twitter to threaten, harass and abuse. Whose side is Twitter on? If they can’t see what’s going on here then it’s safe to assume Twitter has sold out and is effectively dead as a platform for free speech.
Or is it? A quick search reveals that Twitter has yet to remove tweets of my song Nemo’s Antisemitic Universe, despite legal threats from the Jewish lobby currently occupying France, le CRIF. Declaration of human rights on freedom of expression, anyone? As an artist, censorship of the kind I’ve been subjected to is surely the highest accolade? It’s also unlawful, which is certainly one reason why my songs are still up on Twitter and YouTube.
Finally, I just want to quickly mention one example of what I call VIP abuse on Twitter. Along with the usual hacks and pundits who infest the mainstream with cries of ‘Holocaust Denier’, singer Alison Moyet recently called me a ‘vat of pus’. Totally out of the blue, I’d never interacted or tweeted with her before. Once again, the Schadenfreude-filled team of Twitter fishwives patted Moyet on the back and tweeted their liberal approval.
I simply won’t believe Corbyn has any affiliation or connection with the vat of pus that is Alison Chabloz.
— Alison Moyet (@AlisonMoyet) September 15, 2016
Of course, with my account suspended, my reply to Moyet is now invisible:
I don’t need reminding. I called you a vat of pus. I should have said ‘A huge fucking vat of pus’ https://t.co/sTEJ5hU50p
— Alison Moyet (@AlisonMoyet) September 15, 2016
A week after Moyet tweeted – projected? – her thoughts about me, I received a standing ovation for my first ever gig in London: another massive #quenelle to add to my famous photo – now deleted thanks to my detractors’ hyper-sensitivity and mass reports to Twitter. By this time next year, my London Forum video will likely have more than 20,000 views.
Moyet, Lewis and all the rest need to understand that I was always taught that my Grandfather met his violent death as a sacrifice to western Freedom and Democracy. Those who actively encourage censorship, as well as those who remain silent in the face of these glaring double standards, are mere agents of a corrupt state. Arbitrary decisions lead to censorship of some, whereas others are permitted to abuse and harass with impunity. The latter are mostly slaves to a System, whose self-interest trumps the public interest – and therefore their own – every time. Idiots.
Orwell was right: ignorance is strength. Ruination of social media platforms by gangs of desperate, anonymous trolls and greedy, self-obsessed celebs and hacks is doomed to failure. We know it, our enemies know it and every day the general public is growing increasingly aware. There’s still a long fight ahead of us. However, Truth will always prevail in the end. The enemies of free speech will be crushed underfoot like cockroaches scurrying into the darkened stench of a pitiless landscape, their carcasses kicked into a vat of pus of lies and deceit entirely of their own making. Good riddance!
Ethnic Europeans are being discriminated against in their own lands by minority groups. We only have to look at the recent disbarring of Ian Millard by the UK Bar Standards Board, as well as several high profile suspensions – including my own – from Twitter, to understand that there is no other explanation.
Blatant double standards of corporate social media groups are easily explained by looking at who owns these platforms and by observing which groups can use them to smear, threaten and abuse with impunity and which groups cannot. Can someone in London or Dublin please perform a quenelle outside Twitter‘s offices? If Twitter – and indeed the Solicitors Regulation Authority – are quite comfortable with Zionist lawyer Mark Lewis‘ public outbursts, then what harm in an anti-establishment comic salute ou deux?
Why do abusive Zionists need protecting when, clearly, it’s us who need protecting from them?
Just as the illegal Israeli government continues to ethnically cleanse Palestine of native Arabs, so the international Zionist lobby aims to do the same to ethnic white Europeans in Europe and in every other part of the world inhabited by Europeans.
Progressive minds are not fooled by duplicitous, conniving, western mainstream media. Our parasitic controllers are very scared indeed. More and more people are waking up to the incontrovertible truth that they are the ones behind the immigrant invasion of Europe. In fact, more and more people are now realising that Jew-Zionists are pretty much responsible for all the evil that exists in the world today.
They have elevated themselves to positions of importance in finance, government, media and law. Laws are implemented in order to protect Zionist interests at the expense of our own nations, culture and heritage. Speaking or writing about these facts is not ‘hate speech’ or ‘persecution’. It’s the plain truth: it’s happening in front of our own eyes. ‘Diversity’ will eventually mean no diversity: white genes are recessive and white Brits are already a minority in the UK capital.
Being a white nationalist doesn’t mean other groups deserve to be hated. It’s the most natural thing in the world to want to protect and cherish one’s own kind. We need to start behaving in the same way ethnic minority groups behave in a foreign country and take back control.
Zionist-run media i.e. every title going – isn’t going to stick up for the interests of ethnic Brits. Neither are the treasonous hordes of SJW Shabbos Goy. If you’re still wringing your hands at any mention of the far right, just remember that Margaret Thatcher was elected after the Tories stole policies of the National Front. Theresa May has now done the exact same with UKIP policy. Remember, too, that 17.4m Brits voted for Brexit.
If you do not feel concerned about our basic freedoms being abused then perhaps the time has come to ask yourself why. Rather than pointing the finger at patriots, artists and academics and repeating ad nauseum the same Zionist buzzwords, isn’t it time you started defending your own origins, your own people and your own cultural and spiritual heritage, rather than those of a belligerent, hostile tribe?
March 18 2016
Yesterday, March 17, I was present at the Court of Appeal in Paris for what was announced as The Trial of the Century. The trial was centred around a 2011 documentary film by Paul-Eric Blanrue, Un homme, based on the life and work of the world’s foremost “Holocaust” revisionist, Professor Robert Faurisson. The original case against both men was instigated after yet another contrived complaint by French Jewish ‘anti-racism’ association, LICRA (Ligue contre le racisme et l’antisémitisme). Following the discovery of a judicial error by the men’s legal team, the original ‘guilty’ verdict was thrown out, hence this appeal brought by the French state prosecution.
Well over 100 fans of Professor Faurisson were in attendance to support this most honourable man. Despite the importance of the case with regards to freedom of expression and brutal censorship brought about by the promulgation of the 1990 Fabius-Gayssot Act ‘anti-denial’ law, the Parquet de Paris made sure that the audience was held in the tiniest room of the Palais de Justice with just 15 public seats which were given to independent journalists.
The proceedings lasted over two hours. Spontaneous applause broke out several times as the professor and his lawyer, Damien Viguier, entered and left the minuscule chambre 7. Afterwards, in the more spacious corridor outside the chambre, the 87-year old professor gave another lesson in humility and determination and I was able to present myself and sit next to him whilst he signed copies of his books in the most elegant handwriting.
The day before, I had been lucky enough to travel to Zürich to meet Gerard Menuhin, son of famous musician Yehudi and grandson of Moshe (who spent his youth in Palestine in the early 1900s). More about that in another blog; just to say that meeting two of the world’s most respected and important revisionists meant that this has been quite a week.
As well as having the chance to shake hands with these gentlemen, I also met several other notable, like-minded souls. As I explained to one man, the fact that I can speak French was certainly an important factor in my conversion to revisionism. And, as I explained in my recent Information Underground radio interview, before I came to be a revisionist, I was already active in the pro-Palestinian movement. It was Nicolas Anelka‘s quenelle after scoring for West Bromwich Albion in December 2013 which was the turning point, leading me to discover the work of Dieudonné, Alain Soral and, most importantly, Robert Faurisson. And it was my own quenelle gesture at last year’s Edinburgh Fringe Festival which put me firmly on the revisionist map.
Needless to say, mainstream media outlets haven’t even mentioned yesterday’s appeal. The press is more interested in giving a voice and a platform to terrorist Anders Breivik, guilty of murdering 77 white, Norwegian youngsters and who appeared this week in court to contest his ongoing solitary confinement: cue the obligatory photos of Breivik’s ‘Nazi’ salute as the proceedings began.
Breivik was reportedly ‘inspired’ to carry out his evil attack by arch-Islamophobe and über-Zionist Jew, Pamela Geller. It seems Breivik is being used to further smear National Socialism and, for the press, his voice and fake ‘Nazi’ salute would be more newsworthy than the academic, scientific, factual, historical findings of revisionists.
Although the general public is as yet unaware of revisionism’s total victory on all counts, revisionism’s enemies know that, for them, the battle is lost. Indeed, in January, the World Jewish Congress published a piece on its website proclaiming the world to be ‘full of Holocaust deniers’. Revisionism is flourishing all over the world, mainly thanks to the Internet, but not forgetting the counter-productive effect of repressive laws which attack our most precious freedom: the right to think for ourselves and be able to express our opinions without fear of censorship.
For over 50 years, Robert Faurisson has waged intellectual warfare on those determined to silence him. His enemies are, of course, enraged. European leaders in the style of David Cameron and Manuel Valls have recently moved to outlaw the Boycott, Divestment and Sanctions movement against the rogue state of Israel. The UK Jewish lobby has been desperately trying to force the UK justice system to set a precedent with regard to anti-Zionist comment online and several people have been arrested and their computers seized. It is doubtful, however, that any charges will be brought as these would need to be approved by the CPS (Crown Prosecution Service) as well as by the Attorney General.
My own case of being institutionally harassed by elements within the UK Zionist lobby is finally being treated by police – one reason why I have refrained from blogging for the past three months – and, hopefully, a charge of malicious communications will be brought against my abusers who, like Breivik, are staunch supporters of Jewish supremacist Geller.
In the northern hemisphere as winter turns to spring, I feel more able to speak freely about revisionism, even with total strangers. Weary of political and media gangsters who feign disgust whilst shouting Zionist keyword phrases such as antisemitic “Holocaust” denier and far-right, Nazi extremist, I find it’s best to ignore their whining and concentrate instead on spreading the primordial message of revisionism as elucidated by Robert Faurisson in his 60-word (French) phrase, uttered in 1980 and still as true as ever today:
“The alleged Hitlerite gas chambers and the alleged genocide of the Jews form one and the same historical lie, which has permitted a gigantic political and financial swindle whose main beneficiaries are the state of Israel and international Zionism and whose main victims are the German people – but not their leaders – and the Palestinian people in their entirety.”
Thanks to Robert Faurisson, the new Jewish religion of the “Holocaust” with its Zyklon B-filled Holy Grail has been exposed as a load of gaseous nonsense. The court of appeal is due to announce its ruling on May 19. Whatever the verdict, revisionism has already won the day.
Long live revisionism! Long live Faurisson!
One item of news this past week in the Jewish Chronicle and on ITV was the announcement that David Cameron’s Holocaust Memorial Foundation has commissioned a Bafta-winning film company to record the testimonies of Jewish survivors who escaped to Britain during or after WW2.
September 2013, David Cameron announced the creation of a ‘cross party’ Holocaust Commission whose job it would be to deliver recommendations on “ what more needs to be done to ensure Britain has a permanent and fitting memorial and the educational resources needed for generations to come.” The Commission is chaired by Britain’s most powerful Jew and – as befittingly titled by the Jewish Chronicle -‘boss in town’ Mick ‘miner’ Davis, and declares to provide as part of its mission
factual information about what happened, linked to other resources which already provide critical information and education
and to convey
the enormity of the Holocaust and its impact; in particular the loss to mankind of the destruction of European Jewry
… whatever that means.
I’m all in favour of Holocaust education. But, unless I’m much mistaken, the Holocaust is already part of the national curriculum. It hardly needs a Downing Street commission to press home the point, does it?
Despite Alderman’s protestations and a plethora of memorials and organisations which already exist (including Holocaust Educational Trust, the National Holocaust Centre and even a Department of Education-funded UCL masters qualification in Holocaust Education) it would appear that the new project is forging ahead, nicely aided by £50m of funding as promised by the Prime Minister.
If I’d opted to stay at my desk rather than choosing the sofa in preparation to watch Ken Livingstone on BBC Question Time, I wouldn’t have seen the short segment on ITV news: clips of testimonials interspersed with the usual dread-laden voiceover from a ‘journalist’ readily associating misleading terms such as ‘death camp’ with Bergen-Belsen. The coverage is further (dis)graced by newsreader Natasha Kaplinsky’s ‘Never again’ pathos, failing to point out that the same issues which caused the Holocaust in the first place have been happening ever since in occupied Palestine.
Why there is nothing about this story elsewhere in the press is a mystery, although further announcements regarding UKHMF are expected early 2016, possibly to include building plans for the foundation’s forthcoming ‘education’ centre. The Imperial War Museum is one of the contenders as well as other sites along the Thames. The first person to perform a quenelle outside the new premises should definitely be nominated for both the Quenelle d’Or and Faurisson Trophy awards.
Speaking of quenelles, Dieudonné announced in a new video yesterday that his lawyers have managed to secure a 27,000 euro subsidy from the French Minister of Culture, Fleur Pellerin. This news will no doubt displease Dieudo’s detractors, in particular Belgian Jewish associations who were shouting victory in reports of a three-month jail sentence handed to the comedian earlier this week.
Crucify him !
Press treatment of Dieudonné in France bears several extraordinary similarities to that meted out in the UK towards Jeremy Corbyn: accusations of anti-Semitism (when the ‘offence’ is in fact anti-Zionism) and allegations of being an apologist for ‘terrorism’ abound in regard to both men. As with the French (and now international) press’ attitude towards Dieudonné, UK pundits’ muckraking on the subject of Corbyn and his supporters is rather like watching a re-enactment of parts of the New Testament, coordinated amongst others by The Guardian’s Jonathan Freeland, The Times’ Oliver Kamm and the Jewish Chronicle’s Stephen Pollard.
Here, I’d like to refer to the blog post I wrote earlier this week which shows Pollard and Kamm using info from an anonymous Twitter troll in order to force left-wing, veteran Labour MP for Newport, Paul Flynn, to delete a retweet. The scandal was centred around the Sun newspaper’s shoddy poll which alleged that one in five British Muslims were sympathetic towards jihadis. For some reason, after deleting his RT, Flynn decided to block Kamm. Here’s Kamm’s reaction :
The result of Kamm’s threat is best seen in The Huff Post’s publication last Friday, November 27, of yet another Corbyn smear piece featuring – yes, you’ve guessed it – Paul Flynn as Judas. Does the amount of muck being raked by neocons against Corbyn (and against shadow chancellor John McDonnell) suggest that there’s an even greater mountain of dirt hidden behind all the smearing and faux-disdain? What to think of Jewish Chronicle editor Stephen Pollard’s friend and fellow columnist Jonathan Hoffman’s links to far right neo-Nazi EDL and the outlawed JDL Jewish terrorist org?
With Blairites like Kamm and Freedland on board, UK mainstream media’s CrucifyCorbyn™ campaign thinks it can go ahead full steam, seemingly ignorant of the fact that its MO is now completely transparent to a general public more aware than ever before, mainly thanks to the Internet and sharing of information via modern pioneers such as Dieudonné, Gilad Atzmon and David Icke.
As expected, press double standards will persist and a new, totally unnecessary and hideously expensive Holocaust education centre will be inaugurated to the sound of mass weeping, inappropriate use of non-factual evidence by journalists and pathos gushing forth from TV presenters in order to ensure that nice fat pay check keeps on coming.
Once the centre is open, government funding will no doubt be available to subsidise school trips. I imagine there’ll be a coffee area and gift shop selling books and mass-produced memorabilia. Would it be worth the Holocaust Commission considering the possibility of a ‘Holocaust revisionism‘ section either inside the centre itself or, discreetly, on a lower shelf in the gift shop book section (perhaps next to the new edition of Anne Frank’s Diary now Anne & Otto Frank and possibly several other people’s Diary?) After all, revisionism is a booming online grassroots industry and, as we all know, there’s no business like Shoah business.
November has been a dark month for freedom. Indeed, the recent deadly attacks in Paris have served to overshadow several ever-more ghastly attempts by Zionist organisations to stifle freedom of expression. Worst of all, this assault on our most precious of human rights – to be allowed to think for ourselves – is supported by nation states defined as secular western liberal democracies.
Freedom of expression is the well-spring of democracy yet this month we’ve seen state prosecutions lead to jail sentences in three of the world’s supposedly most-developed countries : Ursula Haverbeck in Germany, Arthur Topham in Canada and now a Belgian court has sentenced French comedian Dieudonné to two months in prison for ‘anti-Semitic’ jokes he made during a show in 2012.
Le trophée Faurisson
I’ve been following Dieudonné since the Anelka incident. In January, just after the Charlie Hebdo attacks, I went to see his show ‘La bête immonde’ in Lausanne. There is no doubt in my mind that the man is a genius. No amateur of French language and culture could deny the immensity of his writing talent. Despite a notable lack of any balanced commentary from French and global mainstream media, his greatness is what makes him France’s most successful comedian. He is indisputably the best by miles.
Twice in the space of a fortnight, world Jewry’s public enemy n° 1 stand-up comedian has been again the subject of rigid press releases citing past convictions meant to impress the reader after the ECHR’s decision not to accept Dieudonné’s appeal concerning Professor Robert Faurisson’s fictive Prize for Infrequentability and Insolence.
By claiming that Faurisson’s appearance was not part of the show itself, the ECHR has effectively validated Faurisson’s prize – making it a reality rather than just a provocative ending to a comedy show in a theatre. The prize should become an annual event, Le Trophée Faurisson, pourquoi pas?
Gerard Menuhin is tired of ‘Jewish lies’
Less grey and sinister than thought crime trails – although some would disagree – is a new book by Gerald Menuhin, son of Yehudi Menuhin, ‘Tell the Truth and Shame the Devil‘. Like his father and grandfather, Moshe, Gerard Menuhin has always been an outspoken critic of Israel and global networks of ‘Jewish power’.
In 2005, following pressure from Jewish ‘anti-racist’ organisations, Menuhin was forced to resign his seat on the board of Germany’s Menuhin Foundation. Similarly, since 2009, there is no indication to be found of Menuhin’s continuing administrative position with the Menuhin Festival Gstaad. During my years in Switzerland I reviewed Menuhin Festival concerts for GstaadLife. Was the festival’s decision to distance itself from Gerard Menuhin ‘aided’ by a lucrative sponsorship offer? Indeed, the 2015 edition entitled Musique & Ironie heralds a new partnership with Edmond de Rothschild.
Citizens all over the world are waking up to the fact that these nominally ‘anti-racist’ organisations along with their lackeys in media and government simply want to suppress information and silence their detractors, if necessary by enforcing ridiculous ‘hate speech’ laws which belong in the Middle Ages. These same fascists are also the ones accusing Islam and Muslims of being backward, simultaneously shouting ‘Je suis free speech’ !
Trying to limit or tailor freedom of expression in favour of one or several ethnic groups to the detriment of others is discrimination, pure and simple. Mainstream outlets are awash with hypocrisy and evidence of the extent and nefariousness of anti-Muslim rhetoric being spread by Zionists identifying as Jews along with their right wing Christian and atheist ‘Libertarian’ allies who make up the mainstream – in both senses of the phrase.
Turning a blind eye to the unending atrocities in occupied Palestine, our leaders and their obedient media attack dogs are equally negligent of the urgent needs of their own country. Horror stories of homelessness and DWP-linked suicides are brushed aside in favour of deploying troops in cities and towns – presumably as an answer to government cuts in the police force – as well as urging the bombing of another ME state, Syria, already in turmoil.
British voters and taxpayers won’t put up with another pointless war. Perpetrators of genocide-denial will go on shouting and screaming; mental health smears and aggressive retweeting in abundance, along with predictable cries of ‘Jew-baiting’ and ‘anti-Semite’ thanks to a vociferous, parasitic (and mostly fake) online army of Hasbara propagandists.
Efforts to silence me resulted in my views and thoughts being shared with a maximum number of people. Media coverage of my quenelle was, as expected, less than flattering. However, it also meant thousands more visits to my blog than any review of my show could have achieved. And considering the company I now share here, on Twitter and elsewhere online, I’ll take the whining and grumbling as a compliment.